Teams

Barkley/Bentonville/Matrix

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 2 League · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Abdin/Fayetteville/FACWon 30
W#1 DoublesPablo Corona / Ryan Morris vs Javier Cordero / William Hartle6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGraham Gudis vs Muhammad Leghari6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCooper Barkley / Bruce Barkley vs Max Garcia / Lance Court6-4, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Lasater/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Conklin / Bruce Barkley vs Spencer Miller / James Corbett2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCooper Barkley vs Samuel Musser6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJohn Coker vs Reny Aniline2-6, 2-6
2026-04-26vs Abdin/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
L#1 DoublesBruce Barkley / Graham Gudis vs Javier Cordero / Lance Court3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCooper Barkley vs Wesley Garner2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJoseph Jenson vs Nate Mullen6-4, 6-2
2026-04-25vs Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRCLost 13
L#1 DoublesSean Mahoney / Benjamin Conklin vs Kyden Reeh / Robby Herbert2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGraham Gudis vs Jackson Ritchey3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCooper Barkley / Bruce Barkley vs Jamie Cornett / Jackson Cervantes2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Coker vs Alek Srbinovski6-0, 6-3
2026-04-20vs Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRCWon 41
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Conklin / Graham Gudis vs Anthony Jones / Robert Jones3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Coker vs Jackson Ritchey3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJared Culbert / Binh Nguyen vs Kyden Reeh / Charles Bruce6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRyan Morris vs Alek Srbinovski6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSean Mahoney / Pablo Corona vs Harrison Heien / Will Ginger6-3, 6-4
2026-04-19vs Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRCLost 05
L#1 DoublesGraham Gudis / Benjamin Conklin vs David Sam / Tommy Karr7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Coker vs Jack Vaughan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPablo Corona / Joseph Jenson vs Luke Lundstrum / Davis Elleman3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCooper Barkley vs Isaac Lundstrum1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesClayton DeVera / Ryan Morris vs Josh Larimer / Karthik Nayani0-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRCLost 13
L#1 DoublesBruce Barkley / Graham Gudis vs Davis Elleman / Karthik Nayani3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Coker vs Trevor Mallioux1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCooper Barkley / Benjamin Conklin vs Diem Tran / Morris Rajsombath6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJoseph Jenson vs Jack Vaughan3-6, 4-6
2026-03-30vs Lasater/Rogers/SVCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesCooper Barkley / Bruce Barkley vs Austin Lasater / Jackson Arbeitman7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Conklin vs Samuel Musser6-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesRyan Morris / Graham Gudis vs MICHAEL KLEYDMAN / Spencer Miller4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJohn Coker vs Steven Spaulding5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJared Culbert / AJ Smith vs Dani Adnan / James Corbett7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC8035522293
2Barkley/Bentonville/Matrix35152554392
3Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRC17103065423

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jared Culbert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
John Coker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.79
Cooper Barkley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.76
Benjamin Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
AJ Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Clayton DeVera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Pablo Corona
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Bruce Barkley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Graham Gudis
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.47
Joseph Jenson
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.35
Ryan Morris
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Barkley + Cooper Barkley5152% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Barkley + Pablo Corona404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Culbert
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
John Coker
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Cooper Barkley
13W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Benjamin Conklin
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
AJ Smith
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Clayton DeVera
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Pablo Corona
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bruce Barkley
20W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Graham Gudis
7W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Joseph Jenson
9W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Ryan Morris
23W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.