Teams

Mi.Lee55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-31vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLouella Venable / Diane Adams vs Debra Allen / Darsan Russo2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Lee / Veda Bynum vs Gwen Coyte / Jane Bossert6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTerry Richard / Terry Marcott vs Karen Blume / Jill Rhim2-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs Ly.Longest55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Larrabee / Louella Venable vs Pam Tousseau / Susan Lavrack6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlisa Miller / Veda Bynum vs Lynn Longest / Sierra Luz6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Lee / Karen Clark vs Sally Sikes / Lavonne Moore6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-10vs Ka.Serow55C5.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlisa Miller / Heidi Doyle vs Karen Blume / Randi Rosen2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLori Larrabee / Veda Bynum vs Kathleen Serow / Darsan Russo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLorna Hirsch / Terry Marcott vs Ann Walters / Jane Bossert1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ka.Serow55C5.52051229
2El.Zimmerman55C1142540
3Ki.Lamb55C5.51133760
4Be.Pegram55C1124968
5Mi.Lee55C0112534
6Ly.Longest55C0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lori Larrabee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Tina McIntyre
published
2.55
Michele Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Veda Bynum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Lorna Hirsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Rhonda Rowe
published 2.5
2.09
Louella Venable
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Terry Marcott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Heidi Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veda Bynum + Louella Venable1933% games−2.4% vs expected
Rhonda Rowe + Louella Venable2631% gamesnot enough data
Veda Bynum + Rhonda Rowe0734% gamesnot enough data
Terry Marcott + Lorna Hirsch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lori Larrabee
36W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Tina McIntyre
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Michele Lee
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Veda Bynum
45W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Lorna Hirsch
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Rhonda Rowe
59W–143L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Louella Venable
44W–115L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Terry Marcott
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Heidi Doyle
4W–12L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.