Teams

Ka.Blume40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-30vs La.Kilpatrick40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Randi Rosen vs Dawn Berry / Shayne Brodsgaard2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Blume / Maria Riemann vs Lauren Kilpatrick / Christy Chattleton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVickie Dagit / Kathryn Williamson vs Ann Flores / Amanda Viele6-4, 6-4
2025-09-23vs Da.Rusnak40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Maria Riemann vs Julie Shuey / Diane Maginnis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Sally Sikes vs Rondi Furgason / Nadeen Baddar7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-16vs Me.McCaskill40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Maria Riemann vs Lexie Batchelor / MaryKate Harris6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-09vs Ma.Basil40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Randi Rosen vs Ashley Knowles / Tina Santospago3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Riemann / Justine Saleeby vs Kristi Williams / Amanda Mullen6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-02vs El.Nixon40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Kathryn Williamson vs Courtney Britt / Melanie Frost5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-19vs An.Pershke40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Kathryn Williamson vs Monica Udell / Megan Oneill2-6, 1-6
2025-08-12vs La.Kilpatrick40CLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Randi Rosen vs Amanda Viele / Lauren Kilpatrick6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Sally Sikes vs Jenna Wooten-Quade / Dawn Berry1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Cardona / Maria Riemann vs Shayne Brodsgaard / Ann Flores1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-05vs Da.Rusnak40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Randi Rosen vs Julie Shuey / Diane Maginnis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Maria Riemann vs Dawn Rusnak / Kimberly Roth6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVickie Dagit / Kathryn Williamson vs Jade Paunovich / Megan Mitchell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Karen Blume
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Danielle Cardona
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Justine Saleeby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Carol Rosser
published 3
2.55
Priscilla Nanney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
DEBRA LAUGHERY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
2.41
Helen Michaels
published
2.35
Kathryn Williamson
published
2.35
Randi Rosen
published
2.30
Lusally Hong
published
2.30
Mary McCulley
published
Maria Riemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DEBRA LAUGHERY + Justine Saleeby3743% gamesnot enough data
Priscilla Nanney + Carol Rosser2637% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Dagit + Justine Saleeby4259% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Dagit + Karen Blume224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Blume + Carol Rosser314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Blume
42W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Danielle Cardona
20W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Justine Saleeby
31W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Carol Rosser
45W–76L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Priscilla Nanney
41W–122L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Vickie Dagit
28W–96L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
DEBRA LAUGHERY
48W–91L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Helen Michaels
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Randi Rosen
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Lusally Hong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Mary McCulley
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.