Teams

Lambert Summer 2025

2025 ADULT 55 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MEN

13 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-31vs Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Brown / Peter Heunisch vs Jeff Jara / Glenn Britzius2-6, 2-1
W#2 DoublesKarl Lambert / William Kron vs Will Prest / Mark Alevizos7-6, 6-2
2025-07-24vs Schneider TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesNeil Radermacher / Paul Bates vs Mark van Ert / Shravan Pargal3-6, 2-6
2025-07-10vs Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Kron / Christopher Gustilo vs Tom Olmscheid / Doug Roseth6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Heunisch / Brian Brown vs Jack Elvestrom / Paul Schroeder5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Boulay / Karl Lambert vs Glenn Britzius / Gary Aasen3-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs Schneider TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarl Lambert / Paul Bates vs Bruce Gullikson / Cory O'Brien6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Weed / Scott Swanson vs Todd Schoenwalder / Bill Stelle7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Heunisch / Brian Brown vs Jim Marolt / Paul Schoenecker6-1, 6-2
2025-06-12vs Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Boulay / Karl Lambert vs Glenn Britzius / Gary Aasen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Heunisch / Brian Brown vs Tom Olmscheid / Doug Roseth2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Bates / Neil Radermacher vs Bryan Biever / Jeff Jara6-7, 2-6
2025-06-05vs Schneider TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Casperson / Neil Radermacher vs Bill Stelle / Kraig Gunwall4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesWilliam Kron / Christopher Gustilo vs Jim Marolt / Todd Schoenwalder6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Boulay / Peter Heunisch vs Mark van Ert / Cory O'Brien7-6, 6-4
2025-05-22vs Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesNeil Radermacher / David Casperson vs Jack Elvestrom / Will Prest2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Brown / William Kron vs Christopher Combs / Paul Schroeder2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Boulay / Karl Lambert vs John Andraschko / Bryan Biever4-6, 0-6
2025-05-15vs Schneider TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Gustilo / William Kron vs Douglas Matuska / Mark van Ert4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKen Pomerantz / Charles Weed vs Jim Schneider / Kraig Gunwall0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Daniel Boulay vs Bruce Gullikson / Todd Schoenwalder6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Christopher Gustilo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Daniel Boulay
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.26
Karl Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Peter Heunisch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.16
William Kron
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.10
Paul Bates
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Ken Pomerantz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.02
Brian Brown
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.02
David Casperson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Charles Weed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Neil Radermacher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Claar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Weed + William Kron0738% games−0.1% vs expected
Paul Bates + Neil Radermacher1545% games−2.1% vs expected
Peter Heunisch + Brian Brown134 matchesnot enough data
Peter Heunisch + Daniel Boulay314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Boulay + Karl Lambert134 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Gustilo + William Kron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Gustilo
21W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Daniel Boulay
18W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
Karl Lambert
23W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Peter Heunisch
33W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
William Kron
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Paul Bates
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
Ken Pomerantz
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Brian Brown
17W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
David Casperson
16W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Charles Weed
18W–43L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Neil Radermacher
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.91
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tim Claar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.