Teams

Burkwood Row

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-10vs CCV CooperLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Row / Robin Booth vs Elizabeth Martin / Alison Avery1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFrances Poehler / Lynne Read vs Kristin Mullins / Rachel Piacentini6-7, 1-6
2023-10-27vs ACAC MarksLost 01
L#3 DoublesFrances Poehler / Lynne Read vs Julie Rison / Alicia Watkins6-7, 2-6
2023-10-20vs HCC HolmesLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynne Read / Frances Poehler vs Amery Whitby / Teki Hall3-6, 2-6
2023-10-13vs Raintree RowlandLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Row / Melissa Stewart vs Kimberly Kimball / Rebecca Anissa Rowland3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFrances Poehler / Lynne Read vs Lorraine McGehee / Jennifer Morris6-7, 4-6
2023-09-29vs CCV DeLaceyLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Row / Theresa Hughes vs Karen Williamson / Courtney Harper2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Booth / Amy Holmes vs Amanda Galanti / Ginnie Price2-6, 0-6
2023-09-15vs WOCC Smith / MoehlingWon 10
W#3 DoublesFrances Poehler / Lynne Read vs Heather Drew / Laura Vetter6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Logan Stone
published
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.07
Lindsey O'Kane
published
3.97
Susan Powell
published
3.72
Theresa Hughes
published
3.44
Mary Davis
published
3.42
Nancy Row
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Robin Booth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Frances Poehler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lynne Read
published
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Booth + Nancy Row202347% games−7.0% vs expected
Robin Booth + Frances Poehler3838% gamesnot enough data
Frances Poehler + Nancy Row1438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Logan Stone
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
4.40
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Lindsey O'Kane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.07
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
Theresa Hughes
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Mary Davis
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.44
4
Nancy Row
70W–113L career · 3 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Robin Booth
87W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Frances Poehler
120W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Lynne Read
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.