Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW6.5B

2024 COMBO · Women 6.5

25 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Anh-Vi Dao
published 4
3.40
Karen Rogge
published
3.39
Pooja Tendulkar
published
3.34
Debby Heicklen
published 3.5
3.28
Quynh Luu
published
3.28
3.27
Deena Elfar
published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Koo
published
3.21
3.17
Susan Bolka
published
3.08
Shawna Ballard
published
3.04
Andrea Coleman
published 3
3.02
Gigi Harvey
published
3.00
Svetlana Tounkel
published
2.90
Catherine Nadeau
published 3.5
2.88
Rae Chiang
published
2.86
Yveline Coulond
published
2.81
Nancy Pizzo
published
2.78
Kanika Karu
published
2.74
Vonda Reid
published 3
2.66
Paulina Bettink
published
2.60
Amy Guthrie
published 3
Irina Rahn
published
Jeanette Dayan
published
Maureen Petersen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yveline Coulond + Svetlana Tounkel1638% games−9.2% vs expected
Debby Heicklen + Theresa Dao-Makiyama224 matchesnot enough data
Debby Heicklen + Deena Elfar134 matchesnot enough data
Deena Elfar + Quynh Luu134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anh-Vi Dao
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Karen Rogge
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Pooja Tendulkar
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Debby Heicklen
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Quynh Luu
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Catharine Hershey-Lin
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Deena Elfar
20W–34L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Koo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Theresa Dao-Makiyama
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Susan Bolka
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Shawna Ballard
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Andrea Coleman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
Gigi Harvey
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Svetlana Tounkel
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Catherine Nadeau
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.90
Rae Chiang
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Yveline Coulond
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Nancy Pizzo
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.81
Kanika Karu
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Vonda Reid
19W–25L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Paulina Bettink
2W–17L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Amy Guthrie
2W–17L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Irina Rahn
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeanette Dayan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Petersen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.