← Teams

HERM-Lines

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-03-20vs WO-SampsonLost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Lines / AMY LINES vs Bill Dagostino / Catherine Matawaran6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-19vs BURK-SweeneyWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Daniel Dreyer vs Catherine Sweeney / Scott Schoenwiesner6-2, 6-4
2022-01-22vs ACAC-RalstonWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesAMY LINES / Gray Booker vs Joey Townsend / Lisa Aaron7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.15
Lauren Hutcheson
published —
3.15
Samantha McLean
published —
2.96
Gray Booker
published 3
2.89
Corey Booker
published 3
2.61
Alison Chesson
published 3
2.54
Douglas Lines
published 3
2.47
Wendy Stone
published —
—
Ralph Whitt
published —
—
Rob Chesson
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AMY LINES + Douglas Lines3–450% games+2.9% vs expected
Gray Booker + Corey Booker2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
—
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.15
—
Samantha McLean
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Gray Booker
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Corey Booker
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Alison Chesson
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
—
Wendy Stone
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
—
Ralph Whitt
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
—
Rob Chesson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.