Teams

STL/Arnstein/Novatny/55&Over9.0M

2022 Adult 55 & Over · Men 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-23vs SchlueterWon 20
W#1 DoublesEduardo Abilez / John Novatny vs Paul Reiss / Jake Strelow6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRandy Freeman / Gregg Hanson vs Lyndon Morgan / William Schlueter6-0, 6-2
2022-06-16vs SchlueterWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorge Farmer / Gregg Hanson vs Paul Reiss / Sam Shouldis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Barenkamp / Randy Freeman vs Mark Medley / Scott Sutter7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Arnstein / John Novatny vs William Schlueter / Lyndon Morgan6-0, 6-4
2022-06-09vs SchlueterWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Farmer / John Novatny vs Mark Medley / Scott Sutter7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGregg Hanson / Randy Nistler vs Peter Kielhofner / Lyndon Morgan6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRandy Freeman / Steven Lesko vs Philip Kammann / Paul Reiss6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-02vs SchlueterWon 21
W#1 DoublesRandy Nistler / Stan Hogrebe vs Mark Medley / Sam Shouldis6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJames Barenkamp / Randy Freeman vs Philip Kammann / Paul Reiss5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteven Lesko / Jim Syrett vs Lyndon Morgan / Tim Hasara6-3, 7-5
2022-05-26vs SchlueterWon 20
W#1 DoublesEduardo Abilez / Jim Syrett vs Peter Kielhofner / Mark Medley6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephen Arnstein / Steven Lesko vs William Schlueter / Lyndon Morgan7-6, 6-3
2022-05-19vs SchlueterWon 30
W#1 DoublesGregg Hanson / Randy Nistler vs Scott Sutter / Sam Shouldis6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephen Arnstein / James Barenkamp vs Peter Kielhofner / Mark Medley6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStan Hogrebe / John Novatny vs Tim Hasara / Jake Strelow6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Stan Hogrebe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Eduardo Abilez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Gregg Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
James Barenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Stephen Arnstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
George Farmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Syrett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
John Novatny
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Randy Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Randy Nistler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Lesko
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Arnstein + James Barenkamp404 matchesnot enough data
Eduardo Abilez + Stan Hogrebe303 matchesnot enough data
John Novatny + Jim Syrett303 matchesnot enough data
Randy Freeman + James Barenkamp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stan Hogrebe
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Eduardo Abilez
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Gregg Hanson
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
James Barenkamp
55W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.07
Stephen Arnstein
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.89
George Farmer
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Syrett
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Novatny
24W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Freeman
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Nistler
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Lesko
9W–0L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.