Teams

Mixing It Up (Wofford)

2022 Montgomery Mixed 55 & Over Spring · Montgomery Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-27vs IvanWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarry Wise / Carolyn Greis vs Mayumi Ishihara / Richard McKeon6-7, 3-0
2022-05-26vs Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Garlock / Regina Farrington vs George Briscoe / Jackie Livesay6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarry Wise / Carolyn Greis vs Denise Martin Barnes / Melvin Williams6-0, 6-4
2022-05-23vs IvanLost 01
L#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Thomas O'Toole vs Nancy Trimble / David Cheo2-6, 2-6
2022-05-21vs Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesSimon Linder / Regina Farrington vs George Briscoe / Jothi Nedungadi6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarry Wise / Carolyn Greis vs REGINA DAVIS / Rudolph Isaac6-3, 5-4
2022-05-14vs IvanWon 10
W#3 DoublesGreg Douquet / Regina Farrington vs Nancy Trimble / Richard McKeon7-5, 6-2
2022-05-10vs Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesRegina Farrington / Gabriel McHugh vs REGINA DAVIS / Chris Klocek6-1, 7-5
2022-05-04vs IvanLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Goren / Gabriel McHugh vs Veronique Kessler / James Forbes6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-01vs Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesGabriel McHugh / Jill Herscot vs Shirin Ahmed / Jonathan Ferrell6-2, 6-2
2022-04-24vs IvanLost 01
L#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Joe Ostoyich vs Mary Beth Etherton / Ivan Teelucksingh7-6, 4-5
2022-04-13vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#3 DoublesRegina Farrington / Thomas O'Toole vs Shirin Ahmed / Jonathan Ferrell3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Carolyn Greis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.30
Gabriel McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Regina Farrington
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Nicola Goren
published
Carrie Wofford
published 3.5
Frances Brennan
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Barton-Dock
published
2.66
Dora Macia
published 3
Simon Linder
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Greis
584W–372L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Gabriel McHugh
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Regina Farrington
179W–186L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Nicola Goren
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carrie Wofford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Frances Brennan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Barton-Dock
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Dora Macia
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Simon Linder
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.