Teams

LA-LLW-Hitmen-Debbie Halim

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Men 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavis Kop / Dan Krasner vs John Cox / Matthew DeBose6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-12vs LA - Independence ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesRomain Naegelen / Bijan Pourhamzeh vs Adan Flores / Rafael Herrera7-5, 4-4
2021-06-06vs LA - MoonballersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJordan Fein / Davis Kop vs Gavin Lau / Jorge Reyes7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-16Won 10
W#1 SinglesBijan Pourhamzeh vs Joan Cruells6-0, 6-0
2021-05-02vs LA - Independence ParkWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmit Gupta / Bijan Pourhamzeh vs Rafael Herrera / Jose Rivera6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Tushar Sharma
published
4.40
Eric Fandel
published 4.5
4.29
Kyle MacLelland
published
4.26
Davis Kop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Alex McKinzie
published 4.5
Dan Krasner
published 4.5
4.21
Bijan Pourhamzeh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Amit Gupta
published 5
4.08
Adam Scott
published 4.5
3.93
Kyle Wood
published
Jordan Fein
published
Mike Vuong
published
Shawn Hatosy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle MacLelland + Kyle Wood3454% games+3.0% vs expected
Davis Kop + Bijan Pourhamzeh2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tushar Sharma
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
4.47
4.5
Eric Fandel
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
4.40
Kyle MacLelland
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Davis Kop
79W–42L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Alex McKinzie
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Dan Krasner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Bijan Pourhamzeh
111W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
5
Amit Gupta
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
4.09
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kyle Wood
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
3.93
Jordan Fein
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Vuong
15W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shawn Hatosy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.