Teams

8-MLong2-ENO

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-25vs 2-BAnderson-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Halle Amick1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMegan Chiles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-11vs 5-KLaan-UNCLost 01
L#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Anne Cable6-7
2024-11-04vs 4-MLong-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Miho Ogura2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Christy Avery6-2, 6-3
2024-10-28vs 6-LSimmons-SVCWon 20
W#2 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Laura Gallaher6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Jennifer Magee6-4, 6-3
2024-10-21vs 7-JPermutt-CHTCWon 20
W#2 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Nancy Walden6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Deb Reisinger6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Megan Chiles
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.28
Polly Creveling
published
3.21
Sara Loeblein
published
3.04
Sara Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.02
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Lawrence + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Chiles
155W–47L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Polly Creveling
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
Sara Loeblein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.