Teams

CLAREMONT CC 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-06vs SAN LEANDRO HS 40AW4.0AWon 31
W#1 DoublesLori Bouch / Jane Martz vs Yemia Hashimoto / Snjezana Maric6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCori Kau vs Srinika Narayan2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMadeline Buty / Melissa Murphy vs Tuesdai Powers / Val Swan7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephanie Brendel / Alissa Welch vs Alicia Chung / Khin Tint7-6, 6-2
2025-01-26vs SAN LEANDRO HS 40AW4.0ALost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Murphy / Lisa Ashton vs Tina Chou / Michelle Estrada6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStephanie Brendel / Elizabeth Keville vs Kristina Lovato / Kara Crowe0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Love / Karen Sullivan vs Jennifer Martinis / Junko Green0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Cori Kau
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Becca Laufenberg
published 4
3.65
Alissa Welch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Mary Alice McNeil
published
3.58
Lori Bouch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Melissa Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Madeline Buty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Courtney Azad
published 4
3.34
Stephanie Brendel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Barbara Love
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Keville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jacque Jumper
published
3.14
Katie Goldberg
published
Jane Martz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacque Jumper + Stephanie Brendel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cori Kau
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Becca Laufenberg
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Alissa Welch
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Mary Alice McNeil
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Lori Bouch
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Melissa Murphy
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Madeline Buty
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
Courtney Azad
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Stephanie Brendel
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Barbara Love
3W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Keville
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Jacque Jumper
4W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Katie Goldberg
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jane Martz
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Ashton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.