Teams

Nice Raq

Summer Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY Doubles NA · Womens 3.5 Sumr Dubs Wkdy

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-02-01vs 40LuvSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlli Carr / Nadine Higgins vs Cassie MacDowell / Kristin Zinkl4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesDiana Eppert / Brenda Parnell vs Brenda Bernal / Sandy Smith7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5 Sumr Dubs Wkdy have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Alli Carr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Diana Eppert
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Yanina Carena
published
3.40
Jessica Sisto
published
3.21
Alina Trimble
published 3.5
3.07
Rebecca Alexis
published
2.95
Amy Stecyk
published 3
Claire Williams
published 3
2.74
Courtney Meinen
published 3
2.62
Maggie Bourque
published
Judy Khor
published
Kara Pepe
published
Karen Winborn
published
Laura Senter
published
Leslie Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alli Carr + Yanina Carena5452% games+11.1% vs expected
Yanina Carena + Jessica Sisto8263% games+9.8% vs expected
Alli Carr + Diana Eppert8353% games+9.7% vs expected
Yanina Carena + Diana Eppert12359% games+7.6% vs expected
Alina Trimble + Jessica Sisto4259% games+5.6% vs expected
Alina Trimble + Judy Khor314 matchesnot enough data
Kara Pepe + Alina Trimble033 matchesnot enough data
Kara Pepe + Judy Khor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alli Carr
35W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Diana Eppert
54W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Yanina Carena
64W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jessica Sisto
27W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Alina Trimble
42W–31L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Rebecca Alexis
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Amy Stecyk
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Claire Williams
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Courtney Meinen
39W–45L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Maggie Bourque
28W–29L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Judy Khor
26W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Pepe
21W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Winborn
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Senter
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Sullivan
34W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.