Teams

STC-Revere

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-30vs RBW-CoeLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher McReynolds / Tyler Johnson vs Steve Lang / Richard Drollinger1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Revere / Eric Anderson vs David Pogue / Virl Hill5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKarl Crabs / Gaylord Kellogg vs Terry Coe / Heng Liu3-6, 2-6
2022-10-23vs AYTC-Spirit-PatzWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Feinstein / Christopher McReynolds vs Rick Downey / Gary Renville1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Callaghan / Tyler Johnson vs Hasnain Syed / Joe Duckett0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Romano / John Fisk vs David Kay / James Hornsby6-2, 6-1
2022-10-16vs BETC-WuLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Revere / Karl Crabs vs Jenson Wu / Kyu Yung Kim6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGaylord Kellogg / James Romano vs Edwin Carlos Sr / Bong SantoDomingo4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEric Anderson / John Fisk vs John Hughes / Fei Cheng6-7, 1-6
2022-10-08vs CAC/SL-GarsideSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Romano / Doug Skrobut vs Wayne Stead / Douglas Gordon7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKarl Crabs / Tyler Johnson vs Vincent Choi / Colin Bronemann5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-01vs HBSQ-Wharf Rats-StrongWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Crabs / Mark Revere vs Dean Strong / Robin Kearsley6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeff Feinstein / Christopher McReynolds vs Mike Matysik / Daniel Wilkinson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Romano / Tim Healey vs Nicholas Giordano / Brian Nelson6-1, 6-2
2022-09-25vs MI-Islanders-BoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Romano / Tyler Johnson vs Robert Welland / William Chapman6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKarl Crabs / Mark Revere vs Shawn Preston / Steve Mattox6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGaylord Kellogg / Mark Callaghan vs Michael Bove / Scott Thomson2-6, 2-6
2022-09-18vs PSC-SunLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarl Crabs / Mark Revere vs Matt Neerincx / Zhiming Li5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher McReynolds / Jeff Feinstein vs Yi Sun / Warren Yasutake4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Johnson / John Fisk vs Yue Zhao / Thomas Ng4-6, 4-6
2022-09-11vs RBW-CoeLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Romano / Christopher McReynolds vs Steve Lang / Tim Hanstad1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Skrobut / John Fisk vs Terry Coe / Jeff Wilson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Doug Skrobut
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Jeff Feinstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Karl Crabs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Craig Fiebig
published 3.5
Mark Callaghan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Tyler Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
James Romano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
John Fisk
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Mark Revere
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Christopher McReynolds
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Eric Anderson
published
Gaylord Kellogg
published
Michael Slade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Healey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karl Crabs + Doug Skrobut4258% games+6.1% vs expected
James Romano + Tyler Johnson9556% games+4.5% vs expected
Doug Skrobut + James Romano7255% games+4.3% vs expected
Mark Revere + Karl Crabs381458% games+2.1% vs expected
Karl Crabs + Jeff Feinstein5262% games+1.8% vs expected
Craig Fiebig + Eric Anderson9356% games+0.3% vs expected
Jeff Feinstein + Christopher McReynolds6851% games+0.3% vs expected
James Romano + Christopher McReynolds8352% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug Skrobut
55W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Jeff Feinstein
48W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Karl Crabs
87W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Craig Fiebig
42W–47L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Mark Callaghan
47W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Tyler Johnson
27W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
James Romano
66W–36L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
John Fisk
27W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Mark Revere
55W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.97
3
Christopher McReynolds
40W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Eric Anderson
32W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gaylord Kellogg
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Slade
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Healey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.