Teams

Skyview Busk

2025 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-12vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Fetzer / Pamelia Payne vs Beth Riendeau / Patti Hischmann2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Busk / Lynne Finman vs Terry Shick / Linda Brown3-6, 3-6
2025-03-12vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesApril Manley / Pamelia Payne vs Beth Riendeau / Patti Hischmann1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-26vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Malone / Pamelia Payne vs Beth Riendeau / Pamela Plumlee0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRayetta Spina / Lynne Finman vs Erica Migliorati / Karyn Dolan2-6, 3-6
2025-02-12vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamelia Payne / Linda Lademann vs Yvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRayetta Spina / Judy Hoops vs Linda Jones / Sherry Ruschell3-6, 4-6
2025-02-05vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesLinda Lademann / Pamelia Payne vs Diane Stablein / Valerie Elvin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRayetta Spina / April Manley vs Linda Brown / Linda Jones1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-29vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Fetzer / Rayetta Spina vs Yvonne Schappell / Pamela Plumlee2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Busk / Lynne Finman vs Karyn Dolan / Linda Brown3-6, 0-6
2025-01-15vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Malone / Pamelia Payne vs Rene Stinnett / Yvonne Schappell7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynne Finman / Suzanne Busk vs Linda Jones / Sherry Ruschell3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ellen Barnes
published 4
3.55
Debra Malone
published 4
3.40
Judy Hoops
published
Linda Lademann
published
Lynne Finman
published
Nancy Fetzer
published
Pamelia Payne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rayetta Spina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Suzanne Busk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Fetzer + Rayetta Spina2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Barnes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Malone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Linda Lademann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynne Finman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Fetzer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamelia Payne
36W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rayetta Spina
110W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Busk
19W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.