Teams

Ace Angels

2026 Corpus Christi 40 & Over USTA League · Forty & Over Ladies 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-09vs Dolls with BallsLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatherine Read / BRENDA KOESTERS vs ISLA LARA / Amy Roberts4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKara Campbell / Brooke Thorpe vs Robin Stringer / Jennifer Mays2-6, 1-6
2026-03-02vs RacquettesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKara Campbell / Katherine Read vs Sonja Edwards / Michelle Jordan0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Waugh / Viv Ibarra vs Robin Alspach / Sheri Gagliano3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-23vs 40 LOVESplit 11
L#1 SinglesKira Bonesteel vs Beki Hall5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRosario Martinez / BRENDA KOESTERS vs Brenda Escutia Woods / Rosita Saenz6-4, 6-3
2026-02-09vs Simply SmashingWon 21
W#1 SinglesKira Bonesteel vs Kanyarat Gallegos6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrooke Thorpe / Katherine Read vs Mary Breen / Sara Longoria3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEsmeralda Dean / Viv Ibarra vs Jessica Fitch / Julie Gonzalez6-1, 6-3
2026-02-03vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesViv Ibarra / Brooke Thorpe vs Lauren Prewett / Claudia Lichtenberger2-6, 2-6
2026-02-02vs Cheaper than TherapyWon 21
L#1 SinglesKira Bonesteel vs Laura Bartlett7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Waugh / BRENDA KOESTERS vs Deborah Trevino / Chris Scroggs6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesANGELA Bush / Brooke Thorpe vs Cathy Turnbough / Nancy Hagopian6-0, 6-0
2026-01-19vs RacquettesLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatherine Read / Kara Campbell vs Michelle Jordan / Sheri Gagliano1-6, 3-6
2026-01-12vs Dolls with BallsLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Waugh / Viv Ibarra vs Jennifer Mays / Grais Banks5-7, 2-6
2026-01-05vs 40 LOVESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKira Bonesteel / BRENDA KOESTERS vs Zoey Tran / Cindy Premchan6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Read / Kara Campbell vs Cynthia Winkley / Juanita Hernandez6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Forty & Over Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Esmeralda Dean
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.04
Daralyn Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.97
Barbarra McMinn Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.95
ANGELA Bush
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Thais Hayum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Heather Waugh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Rosario Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.82
BRENDA KOESTERS
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Chimene Burnett
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.78
Kara Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Brooke Thorpe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Kira Bonesteel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Katherine Read
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.27
Viv Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esmeralda Dean + Thais Hayum3444% games+4.0% vs expected
Chimene Burnett + Barbarra McMinn Gonzales6947% games−4.5% vs expected
Rosario Martinez + Barbarra McMinn Gonzales314 matchesnot enough data
Esmeralda Dean + Barbarra McMinn Gonzales224 matchesnot enough data
Barbarra McMinn Gonzales + Thais Hayum134 matchesnot enough data
BRENDA KOESTERS + Katherine Read033 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Thorpe + Katherine Read033 matchesnot enough data
ANGELA Bush + Rosario Martinez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Esmeralda Dean
24W–28L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Daralyn Lopez
37W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Barbarra McMinn Gonzales
36W–45L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
ANGELA Bush
20W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Thais Hayum
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Heather Waugh
8W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Rosario Martinez
19W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
BRENDA KOESTERS
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chimene Burnett
24W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Kara Campbell
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Brooke Thorpe
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Kira Bonesteel
5W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
Katherine Read
13W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Viv Ibarra
13W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.