Teams

Hollis/Memphis

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-12vs Brown/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJonathan Laman / Ana Yambrek vs Emily Brown / Alfredo Ale1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Forbes / Jennifer Wright vs Latasha Echols / Steven Philips7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Gregg / Lynn Davis vs Lesley Grubbs / Tyler Darby0-6, 1-6
2025-06-11vs Brown/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesAna Yambrek / Joe Johnson vs Emily Brown / Jeff Yearwood6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Walker-Hulette / Jonathan Laman vs Alfredo Ale / Andrea Henry5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Hollis-Talley / Daniel Forbes vs J R Cagle / Stephanie Longsworth4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Jonathan Laman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Ana Yambrek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
William Pettit
published
3.83
Will Hudson
published
3.80
Paul Woods
published
3.79
Daniel Forbes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Joe Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Debbie Walker-Hulette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Hayley Hudson
published
3.70
Stacey Hyde
published
3.69
Laura Hollis-Talley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Matthew Gregg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Claire Fowler
published 4
3.34
Carmen Lewis
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Fowler + Matthew Gregg404 matchesnot enough data
Will Hudson + Hayley Hudson134 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Hyde + Joe Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Laman
26W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
Ana Yambrek
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
William Pettit
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Will Hudson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Paul Woods
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Daniel Forbes
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Joe Johnson
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Walker-Hulette
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Hayley Hudson
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Stacey Hyde
33W–21L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Laura Hollis-Talley
37W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Matthew Gregg
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Claire Fowler
28W–18L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Carmen Lewis
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.