Teams

4LIB-KORNFELD 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM

2022 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-12-03vs 5DEER-GURN 35 M FALL SINGLES SEMWon 30
W#1 SinglesYoungjun Woo vs Joseph Derkos6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRahul Bhatnagar vs Joshua Ewald6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJose Briceno vs Noah Casser6-3, 4-3
2022-11-06vs 2WESS-ZUGER 35 M FALL SINGLES SEMLost 01
L#1 SinglesJon Houston vs Brett Thompson2-6, 3-6
2022-10-15vs 1LIB-WYNN 35 M FALL SINGLES SEMWon 21
W#1 SinglesJose Briceno vs Patrick Haley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKiran Bandiatmakur vs Karl Tek6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJon Houston vs Michael Wynn1-6, 5-4
2022-10-01vs 3SCWB-GAY 35 M FALL SINGLES SEMWon 20
W#1 SinglesYoungjun Woo vs Bill Casey6-3, 3-2
W#3 SinglesKiran Bandiatmakur vs Michael Bloom6-3, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
15DEER-GURN 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM5112615138
24LIB-KORNFELD 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM327817123
32WESS-ZUGER 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM3310819150
41LIB-WYNN 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM3381022163
56EAST-MITCHELL 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM236917140
68FAC-CROUSON 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM249918129
73SCWB-GAY 35 M FALL SINGLES SEM2481018135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Chris Theriot
published 4
3.52
Rahul Bhatnagar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Kiran Bandiatmakur
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Chao Huang
published 3.5
3.08
Seth Kornfeld
published
2.90
Jon Houston
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jose Briceno
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Youngjun Woo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Kornfeld + Kiran Bandiatmakur213 matchesnot enough data
Jose Briceno + Chris Theriot303 matchesnot enough data
Rahul Bhatnagar + Chris Theriot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Theriot
190W–92L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Rahul Bhatnagar
109W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Kiran Bandiatmakur
76W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Chao Huang
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Seth Kornfeld
46W–74L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jon Houston
13W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jose Briceno
34W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Youngjun Woo
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.