Teams

6 Salisbury Lineberger

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.08 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-26vs 5 Avalon McCarty HeaviesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTommy Bader / Cooper Steinour vs Seth Nelson / Derrick Wafford4-6, 5-7
2023-08-21vs 1 Belmont Ballers GruhlSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Richard Lloyd vs Doug Bond / Douglas Scammell3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / J Lafors vs Brett Sinsabaugh / Grant Slegowski6-4, 6-3
2023-08-09vs 7 ACAC JohnstonLost 01
L#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Dean Deaver vs Donnell Stewart / Bert Teachey3-6, 2-6
2023-08-05vs 4 Acac StephensWon 10
W#3 DoublesTommy Bader / Thomas Ager vs Greg Deeb / Alex Neuwelt6-2, 6-4
2023-07-15vs 5 Avalon McCarty HeaviesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTommy Bader / Cooper Steinour vs Seth Nelson / Derrick Wafford7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Jim Riley vs Christopher Mumford / Brad Williamson2-6, 3-6
2023-07-08vs 3 Woodlake PattersonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTommy Bader / Thomas Ager vs Eric Estes / Mikhil Sanduria2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Richard Lloyd vs Ike Jemi-Alade / Samuel Mauldin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cooper Steinour
published 4.5
4.12
Stuart Fulcher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Geoff Usher
published
3.89
J Lafors
published
3.85
Tommy Bader
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
David Voth
published 4
3.79
Richard Lloyd
published
3.75
Charles Means
published 4
3.71
Mark Holland
published
Dean Deaver
published 3.5
Drew Lineberger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuart Fulcher + Tommy Bader7749% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cooper Steinour
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
Geoff Usher
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.10
J Lafors
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Tommy Bader
115W–143L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.85
4
David Voth
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Richard Lloyd
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Charles Means
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
Mark Holland
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Dean Deaver
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.