Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Balch

2023 Winter League-Saturday · 3.0M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 2.78 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-01vs Liberty Park Tennis-OsbornLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlfred Balch / Jeff Neuberger vs Ron Burnside / Bruce Teran2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Bailey / Benjamin Wilson vs Don McBroom / Mike Easton4-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesMufiz Shaikh / Larry Richie vs Kirk Watanuki / David Osborn3-6, 2-6
2023-03-25vs Sports Mall-BachmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Christensen / Ryan Riches vs Jacob Jaskierny / Thad Smith2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBALAJI PINJALA / Mufiz Shaikh vs Dean Bachman / Nick Anderson3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Porter / Jeff Neuberger vs Mike Johnson / Marco Pacheco1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-03-18vs Sports Mall-RozsaLost 03
L#1 DoublesGlenn Bailey / Shawn Lay vs Daniel Cobbley / Brian Hanks3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlfred Balch / Mufiz Shaikh vs Ernie Costello / Loren Knaphus3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTimothy Jeffryes / Mark Stonehocker vs Andrew McCubbins / Jason Nguyen0-6, 1-6
2023-03-11vs Cottonwood Club-Arico/RuprechtLost 02
L#1 DoublesBALAJI PINJALA / Glenn Bailey vs Shawn Hazen / JONAS PERSCH7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Stonehocker / Timothy Jeffryes vs Howard Davis / Karl Kieffer6-7, 2-6
2023-03-04vs Salt Lake Tennis-Smith/FolletteWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Christensen / Ryan Riches vs Manti Hansen / Ben Jones4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChris Porter / Shawn Lay vs Robert Smith / Fernando Torres4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Neuberger / BALAJI PINJALA vs Casey Buxton / Pete Longhurst6-2, 6-3
2023-02-25vs Sports Mall-NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Jeffryes / Shawn Lay vs Nathan Nguyen / Ryan Farr2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlfred Balch / Jeff Neuberger vs BART SHARP / Bradley Holmes2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Wilson / Larry Richie vs Reed Reinhold / Cameron Colligan2-6, 2-6
2023-02-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-VisserWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Riches / Michael Christensen vs Mikael Johnson / Michael Mejia6-3, 3-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlfred Balch / Jeff Neuberger vs Endhi Visser / Matthew Law6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Wilson / BALAJI PINJALA vs John Love / Andrius Sidlauskas6-2, 6-2
2023-02-04vs Salt Lake Tennis-Soffe/PonsetiLost 12
W#1 DoublesShawn Lay / Chris Porter vs Dan Murray / Briton McConkie4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGlenn Bailey / Benjamin Wilson vs Eric Christensen / STEVE MATSEN5-7, 1-3
L#3 DoublesAlfred Balch / Timothy Jeffryes vs Brent Higgs / Jack Pendergast4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesShawn Lay / Chris Porter vs Matthew Heller / Matthew Coleman6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Stonehocker / Timothy Jeffryes vs Eddie Fung / Thomas Good0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Wilson / Glenn Bailey vs Travis Charbonneau / Charlie Spencer6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Shawn Lay
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Chris Porter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
BALAJI PINJALA
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Glenn Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.48
Alfred Balch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.47
Benjamin Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.37
Mark Stonehocker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Timothy Jeffryes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.07
Larry Richie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeff Neuberger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ryan Riches
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Stonehocker + Larry Richie3347% games+9.0% vs expected
Shawn Lay + Chris Porter111547% games+0.8% vs expected
Timothy Jeffryes + Glenn Bailey61640% games+0.6% vs expected
Timothy Jeffryes + Alfred Balch11630% games−3.7% vs expected
Alfred Balch + Benjamin Wilson1433% games−4.4% vs expected
Timothy Jeffryes + Benjamin Wilson1431% games−7.7% vs expected
Mark Stonehocker + Benjamin Wilson2538% games−8.8% vs expected
Glenn Bailey + Benjamin Wilson32037% games−9.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shawn Lay
66W–46L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3
Chris Porter
52W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
3
BALAJI PINJALA
9W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Glenn Bailey
46W–138L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Alfred Balch
51W–204L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%57%43%
2.48
3
Benjamin Wilson
20W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Mark Stonehocker
17W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Timothy Jeffryes
26W–102L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Larry Richie
39W–119L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jeff Neuberger
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Riches
13W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.