Teams

Simpson/40/7.5/CWN/UC

2025 BR Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 BR (40&O) Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-06vs Sharpless/40/7.5/CWN/SOACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Mary Cranford vs Cindy Plaia Meaux / Buffy Meyer5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Thompson / Carmen Lavergne vs Kimberly Fontenot / Katherine Hines6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-08vs Lovell/40/7.5/CWN/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Person / Heidi Morton vs Kim Elston / Cherie Favaro5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDelia Taylor / Susan Smith vs Laura Frost / Stephanie LeGrange2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Simpson / Susan Harthcock vs Lee Anne Tranchina / Suzanne Wortmann2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Lovell/40/7.5/CWN/BRECWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorraine Peak / Carmen Lavergne vs Stephanie LeGrange / Hollie Easterling3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary Cranford / Paula Simpson vs Patti Hiller / Marisa Minor5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Thompson / Leah Jenkins vs Cherie Favaro / Colleen Schneller6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-25vs Sharpless/40/7.5/CWN/SOACWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Marjorie Person vs Rebecca Campbell / Katherine Hines6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Harthcock / Cindy Kelley vs Leslie Fernandez / Marcia Weger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 BR (40&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Delia Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Heidi Morton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Susan Harthcock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Natalie Anding
published
3.59
Lisa Marie Raiford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Lorraine Peak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Mary Cranford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Leah Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Carmen Lavergne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Cindy Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Paula Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Dianne Bourgeois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Heather Day
published
Marjorie Person
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delia Taylor + Lisa Marie Raiford1437% games−11.4% vs expected
Leah Jenkins + Mary Cranford134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Harthcock + Lisa Marie Raiford213 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Morton + Lisa Marie Raiford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Delia Taylor
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Heidi Morton
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Susan Harthcock
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Natalie Anding
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lisa Marie Raiford
28W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Lorraine Peak
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Mary Cranford
33W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Leah Jenkins
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carmen Lavergne
27W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cindy Kelley
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Paula Simpson
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Dianne Bourgeois
11W–7L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Heather Day
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marjorie Person
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.