Teams

BARLETT (DAY)

2025 South East Tennis Combo 65 & over · Women 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-21vs Bachman/Dillon DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Maurer / Janney Warren vs Dianne McKenna / Joyce Jordan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerry McCool / Michele Melin vs Janet Harbeck / Patricia Breyfogle6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth King / Judy Hoell vs Paula Bachman / Susan Thompson1-6, 4-6
2025-10-16vs Stephenson/Williamson DAYWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharon Smith / Vicky Bell vs Lori Keipper / Debra Carbone6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Borgese / Anne Mathias vs Kathleen Hawkins / Jane Thomas6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Jane Johnson / Michele Melin vs Kelli Brownfield / Cheryl Matsche6-4, 7-5
2025-10-03vs Bachman/Dillon DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Borgese / Barbara Goodman vs Anne Ryals / Dianne McKenna6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTerry McCool / Vicky Bell vs Paula Bachman / Joyce Jordan4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Drake / Elizabeth King vs Janet Harbeck / Georgina Dillon6-2, 6-1
2025-09-30vs Stephenson/Williamson DAYLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Maddux / Sara Maurer vs Lori Keipper / Debra Carbone6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerry McCool / Michele Melin vs Kathleen Hawkins / Diane Thorne6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Goodman / Nancy Borgese vs Michelle Volk / Cheryl Matsche6-7, 6-7
2025-09-16vs Bachman/Dillon DayWon 21
L#1 DoublesJonnie Harris / Barbara Goodman vs Dianne McKenna / Joyce Jordan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Mathias / Nancy Borgese vs Susan Thompson / Donna Robinson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry McCool / Judy Hoell vs Linda Dodson / Cynthia Lundy6-3, 6-2
2025-09-12vs Stephenson/Williamson DAYLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Maddux / Sharon Smith vs Lori Keipper / Debra Carbone4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNancy Borgese / Anne Mathias vs Kelli Brownfield / Lisa Williamson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry McCool / Jonnie Harris vs Carrie Guerrette / Pamela Tharrington4-6, 3-6
2025-09-04vs Bachman/Dillon DayWon 21
L#1 DoublesVicky Bell / Nancy Borgese vs Paula Bachman / Joyce Jordan4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth King / Mary Jane Johnson vs Georgina Dillon / Dianne McKenna6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJonnie Harris / Judy Hoell vs Cynthia Lundy / Donna Robinson6-3, 6-3
2025-08-28vs Stephenson/Williamson DAYWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Maddux / Sara Maurer vs Kathleen Hawkins / Diane Thorne3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Smith / Michele Melin vs Lisa Williamson / Ann Perry6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Drake / Elizabeth King vs Cheryl Matsche / Michelle Volk1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barbara Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Michele Melin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Kathy Drake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Anne Mathias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Janney Warren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Mary Jane Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Nancy Borgese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Vicky Bell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Jonnie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Judy Hoell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Terry McCool
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Cheryl Maddux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Borgese + Anne Mathias4165% gamesnot enough data
Terry McCool + Mary Jane Johnson4149% gamesnot enough data
Janney Warren + Anne Mathias314 matchesnot enough data
Jonnie Harris + Anne Mathias314 matchesnot enough data
Janney Warren + Michele Melin303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Borgese + Vicky Bell123 matchesnot enough data
Terry McCool + Michele Melin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Goodman
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Melin
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
Kathy Drake
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Anne Mathias
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Janney Warren
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Mary Jane Johnson
11W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Nancy Borgese
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Vicky Bell
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Jonnie Harris
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Judy Hoell
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Terry McCool
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheryl Maddux
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.