Teams

Wallace - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-28vs Gandy - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Dempsey / Stacy Wilks vs Amelia Gandy / Mary Bryan4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSue Nast / Karen Penn vs Bonnie Bucco / Dana Persons6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Chelsea Simpson vs Melissa Caster / Tracey Mcclurd3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-07vs Escambia/HicksLost 12
W#1 DoublesChelsea Simpson / Sue Nast vs Ingrid Corbett / Amy R Falzone6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Dempsey / Stacy Wilks vs Gloria Langan / Rosa Aguilar Fernandez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristyn Miller / Thuy Nguyen vs Tonya Pfeifle / Susan Rice2-6, 1-6
2026-02-21vs Gandy - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Kristyn Miller vs Denise Prindiville / Bonnie Bucco2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesThuy Nguyen / Chelsea Simpson vs Tracey Mcclurd / Melissa Caster7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStacy Wilks / Kelly Dempsey vs Jeannette Fabbro / Lisa Greskovich7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-19vs Escambia/HicksLost 12
W#1 DoublesThuy Nguyen / Sue Nast vs Rene Abel / Rosa Aguilar Fernandez4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Dempsey / Stacy Wilks vs Ingrid Corbett / Van Hughes3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Wilson / Elizabeth Elliott vs Sandra Wilson / Heather Sefton-Sterling5-7, 1-6
2026-02-08vs Gandy - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Kristyn Miller vs Judy Harrington / Tracey Mcclurd4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Wilks / Elizabeth Elliott vs Jill Gonzalez / Denise Wilson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Penn / Sue Nast vs Dana Persons / Bonnie Bucco2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-24vs Escambia/HicksWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Wilks / Elizabeth Elliott vs Heather Doerr / Patricia Leahy6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Kristyn Miller vs Kris Pritchard / Ingrid Corbett6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Wilson / Kelly Dempsey vs Rene Abel / Rosa Aguilar Fernandez2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Elizabeth Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Kelly Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Karen Penn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Chelsea Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Sue Nast
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Stacy Wilks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Jill Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Dempsey + Stacy Wilks044 matchesnot enough data
Kristyn Miller + Jacqueline Wallace213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Kelly Dempsey
4W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Karen Penn
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Chelsea Simpson
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Stacy Wilks
17W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Jill Wilson
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.