Teams

CROW CANYON CC CM6.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-03vs PLEASANTON CM6.5DWon 20
W#1 DoublesVishal Shenoy / Pete Brown vs Dattu Akella / Venkata Sravan Nittala6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRichard San Vicente / Paul Krueger vs Jay Jwalanaiah / Jagadish Beeram2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-30vs STONEBRAE CC CM6.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard San Vicente / Vishal Shenoy vs Edward Tang / Woody Walters1-6, 5-7
2024-10-02vs PLEASANTON CM6.5DWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Krueger / Robert Skok vs Jay Jwalanaiah / Jagadish Beeram6-4, 6-4
2024-09-29vs PLEASANTON CM6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesPete Brown / Vishal Shenoy vs Nikhil Agashe / Nikhil Prakash6-4, 6-4
2024-09-18vs PLEASANTON CM6.5EWon 10
W#2 DoublesPete Brown / Vishal Shenoy vs Santosh Bisht / Nikhil Joshi6-0, 6-2
2024-09-14vs SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC CM6.5DLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Graff / Paul Krueger vs Jeffrey Cannon / Woody Walters1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Vishal Shenoy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.30
Steve Heninger
published 3.5
3.20
Chris Picht
published 3.5
3.14
Paul Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Perry Teevens
published
2.89
Edward Graff
published
2.71
Richard San Vicente
published
2.71
Pete Brown
published
2.59
Terry Church
published
Gary Peer
published
Greg Sharkey
published
Steve Shoaf
published
Terry Feng
published
William Pratt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Heninger + Vishal Shenoy131152% games+3.8% vs expected
Edward Graff + Terry Feng7263% gamesnot enough data
Steve Heninger + Chris Picht3252% gamesnot enough data
Edward Graff + Terry Church123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Vishal Shenoy
63W–56L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Steve Heninger
52W–50L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Chris Picht
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Paul Krueger
46W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
Perry Teevens
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Edward Graff
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Richard San Vicente
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Pete Brown
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Terry Church
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Gary Peer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Sharkey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Shoaf
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Feng
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Pratt
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.