Teams

OC Team Courage Heritage Park - Nisha Sun1

2024 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

19 players · average NTRP 4.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Pat Papartassee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Genelle Vandenboss
published
4.02
Hye Jin Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Risa Chung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.95
Katie Huyen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.91
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Scott Poveromo
published
3.77
David Mak
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.76
James Ha
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Meghan Lake
published
3.70
Mercedes Natvig
published
3.61
Julie Mak
published
3.52
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Nisha Anish
published
3.33
Neb Petrovacki
published
3.18
Kristi Wechsler
published
Eugene Nguyen
published
Rafael Nieto
published
Wilson Teo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Ha + Kristen Petrovacki5069% gamesnot enough data
David Mak + Hye Jin Robertson1446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Pat Papartassee
75W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Genelle Vandenboss
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.07
4.5
Hye Jin Robertson
159W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Risa Chung
157W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Katie Huyen
90W–34L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Kristen Petrovacki
133W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Scott Poveromo
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
David Mak
77W–78L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
James Ha
88W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Meghan Lake
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Mercedes Natvig
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.70
Julie Mak
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.52
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.36
Neb Petrovacki
28W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Kristi Wechsler
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
Eugene Nguyen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rafael Nieto
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wilson Teo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.