Teams

Andy Whyte / Ming Tien

Northern Tier - Adults · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-12vs Jason Hinkledire / Jim HuntLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Park / Geoffrey Field vs Nicholas Governatori / Dayvon Addison6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJonathan Dexter vs Tarkeshwar Singh3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Mowery / Stephan Goetz vs Mitchell Meuser / Mook Bangalore3-6, 2-6
2026-06-21vs Jason Hinkledire / Jim HuntWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Fiorenzo / Geoffrey Field vs Jason Hinkledire / Nicholas Governatori1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Dexter vs Dayvon Addison3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Cullina / Andrew Whyte vs Peter Butler / Bill Kibler2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-07vs Jason Hinkledire / Jim HuntLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Field / Craig Newschaffer vs Nicholas Governatori / Jeff Livermore4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJonathan Dexter vs Tarkeshwar Singh6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Mowery / Andrew Whyte vs Ayush Pandey / Mitchell Meuser4-6, 3-6
2026-06-06vs Jason Hinkledire / Jim HuntLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Cullina / Kevin Fiorenzo vs Jeff Livermore / Nicholas Governatori4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGeoffrey Field vs Mitchell Meuser2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Mowery / Jonathan Dexter vs Dayvon Addison / James Hunt6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-26vs Jason Hinkledire / Jim HuntSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Fiorenzo / Craig Newschaffer vs Nicholas Governatori / Dayvon Addison4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephan Goetz / Andrew Whyte vs James Hunt / Peter Butler7-6, 6-0
2026-05-17vs Jason Hinkledire / Jim HuntWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Field / Jonathan Dexter vs Jason Hinkledire / Mook Bangalore6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Mowery / Stephan Goetz vs James Hunt / Nan Zhu6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jason Hinkledire / Jim Hunt06131123189
2Andy Whyte / Ming Tien06111330230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Geoffrey Field
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.29
Craig Newschaffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Kevin Fiorenzo
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.11
Jonathan Dexter
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
3.10
Stephan Goetz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Andy Mowery
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
3.05
Andrew Whyte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geoffrey Field
18W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Craig Newschaffer
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Kevin Fiorenzo
9W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Jonathan Dexter
15W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Stephan Goetz
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Andy Mowery
16W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Andrew Whyte
10W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.