Teams

ABroemel (Queens)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Sison / Rachel Miller vs Stephanie Rock / Trisha Smith2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Cox / Joelle Voogt Jacobs vs Rebecca Cooper / Katie Cronin5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Morrow / Dana Demick vs Lindsey Ferguson / Kathy Harborne3-6, 1-6
2026-08-25vs AHall (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Purmort / Kara Tringali vs Lauren Humphries / Kimberly Powell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrina Cone / Rachel Miller vs Julie Ackerlund / Alexis Schwartz7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Cox / Joelle Voogt Jacobs vs Shannon Burke / Kelly Wolff6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesAllison Purmort / Virginia Wooten vs Gretchen Hildner / Lisa Wright6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Hoover / Kathy Kopec vs Jackie Graber / Jessica Bradford7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarissa Connolly / Allison Broemel vs Pinkie Watkins / Jenny Duran7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Claire Cox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Kara Tringali
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Allison Broemel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Marissa Connolly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Allison Purmort
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kathy Kopec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Virginia Wooten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Susan Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Anna Sison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Trina Cone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Dana Demick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joelle Voogt Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Tringali + Allison Purmort161156% games−0.9% vs expected
Allison Purmort + Virginia Wooten123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Cox
3W–4L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Kara Tringali
75W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Allison Broemel
65W–92L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Marissa Connolly
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Allison Purmort
58W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kathy Kopec
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.76
Virginia Wooten
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Susan Hoover
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Anna Sison
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Trina Cone
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Dana Demick
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Joelle Voogt Jacobs
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.