Teams

Smoot

2021 Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-01-09vs Cha / FungWon 10
W#3 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / James Smoot vs Elizabeth Larson / DONALD CRAWLEY4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-01-02vs Cha / FungWon 10
W#3 DoublesApril Braxton / James Smoot vs Kathleen Su / Doug DeLawter6-4, 6-4
2020-12-20vs Cha / FungLost 01
L#3 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Matthew Baker vs Meghan Damico / DONALD CRAWLEY6-7, 2-6
2020-12-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Jonathan Chen vs Marketa Chromkova / DONALD CRAWLEY0-6, 3-6
2020-12-06vs Cha / FungLost 01
L#3 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Jude Muneses vs Kathleen Su / Doug Ferguson2-6, 2-6
2020-11-14vs Cha / FungLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Smoot / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Virginia Fung / Matthew Taylor3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesApril Braxton / Matthew Baker vs Lindsey Keeler / Jared Fly1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
James Smoot
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.40
Matthew Geppi
published 4.5
4.14
Shelena Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
April Braxton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Farzaneh Navid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Dao Phan-Vissering
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
David Trang
published 4.5
Lori Brathwaite
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dao Phan-Vissering + James Smoot2544% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Geppi + Dao Phan-Vissering404 matchesnot enough data
Farzaneh Navid + James Smoot213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Smoot
262W–225L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Shelena Sanderson
199W–141L career · 6 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
April Braxton
79W–97L career · 2 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Farzaneh Navid
119W–111L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%25%75%
4.09
4.5
Dao Phan-Vissering
232W–272L career · 3 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
3.93
4.5
David Trang
0W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.85
Lori Brathwaite
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.