Teams

GF:Terminetters:Larson

2025 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women 2

15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-02-16vs NHH:Fireballs:Gershfeld/RosenfeldWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Hacker / Sarah Johnson vs Svetlana Gershfeld / Sandra Kennedy6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLuciana Bonifacio / Kristine Larson vs Kim-Alyson DeMico / Margaret Andrews7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Davis / Pamela Pascale vs Karen Grosjean / Laura Freebairn-Smith4-6, 6-4
2025-01-25vs TCT:3.0 Racquettes:BuschauerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Armstrong / Paige Terry vs Ellen McCabe / Kristen Scully3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Broder / Ashley Davis vs Stacy Byron / Amy Carniol0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesXu Cheng / Robin Campot vs Melissa Langhan / Deborah Nicolson7-5, 6-3
2025-01-04vs MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/KruglakSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaria Hacker / Holly Wheeler vs Cathleen Carroll / Eileen Wildermann7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPamela Pascale vs Jennifer Purgatorio6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Fogerty / Kristen Mercuri vs Marci Palluzzi / Kristin Gladney6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAsiye Kay Underhill / Michelle Cohen vs Maura Leone / Elisabeth Caplan6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-12-15vs MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/KruglakLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllison Armstrong / Luciana Bonifacio vs Linda Cantley / Cathleen Carroll2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan DeWitt vs Eileen Wildermann6-4, 1-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Pascale / Ashley Davis vs Maura Leone / Paula Loria6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesXu Cheng / Alison Broder vs Karen Ahern / Amanda Raubenstine7-6, 4-6
2024-12-07vs GF:No Strings Attached:McEwenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Hacker / Meghan DeWitt vs Mallory Botta / Suzanne Black6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAsiye Kay Underhill / Kristine Larson vs Tanya Flynn / Jamie Rubin4-6, 3-6
2024-11-09vs NHH:Fireballs:Gershfeld/RosenfeldLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristen Mercuri / Allison Armstrong vs Carol Hazen / Sandra Kennedy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPamela Pascale vs Sydnee Sousa2-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Davis / Melissa Fogerty vs Svetlana Gershfeld / Margaret Andrews4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAsiye Kay Underhill / Kristine Larson vs Kim-Alyson DeMico / Laura Freebairn-Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-03vs MIL:What a Racket:ConsiglioLost 13
L#1 DoublesLuciana Bonifacio / Maria Hacker vs Jeanne Consiglio / Allyson Moran7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMeghan DeWitt vs Angela Salcedo4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Broder / Xu Cheng vs Jinping Wang / Christine Kay2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Davis / Michelle Cohen vs Elena Savelyeva / Stacey Sager6-7, 1-6
2024-10-13vs TCT:3.0 Racquettes:BuschauerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMeghan DeWitt / Kristine Larson vs Deirdre Chrostowski / Megan Patzelt3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Mercuri vs Svetlana Maisheva6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Campot / Michelle Cohen vs Jenny Buschauer / Stacy Byron1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Broder / Pamela Pascale vs Caroline Fisher / Ellen McCabe2-6, 1-6
2024-10-05vs GF:No Strings Attached:McEwenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaria Hacker / Luciana Bonifacio vs Ann Haren / Patricia Kahlbaugh6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeghan DeWitt vs Molly Franke5-7, 6-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Johnson / Pamela Pascale vs Tanya Flynn / Kathy McEwen4-6, 6-6
W#3 DoublesXu Cheng / Holly Wheeler vs Stacey Michael / Donna Philbin3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-28vs MIL:What a Racket:ConsiglioLost 13
W#1 DoublesMeghan DeWitt / Ashley Davis vs Carol Finnucan / Lynn Allen7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesPamela Pascale vs Stefanie Kreiger2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Terry / Kristine Larson vs Christine Kay / Jinping Wang6-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesLuciana Bonifacio / Michelle Cohen vs Ila Osach / Blair Pierce6-7, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 Women 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIS:Mystic Bees:Burke0823819236
2OSRC:The Slice Girls:Collins0822920222
3LS:Wild Aces:Geaman/Caulkins08131636274
4LS:Shore Winners:Kupka/Cote08102148330
5LS:Tequila and Lyme:Trusilo0892349323
6MIL:What a Racket:Consiglio010261232340
7GF:No Strings Attached:McEwen010211536359
8TCT:3.0 Racquettes:Buschauer010201838325
9GF:Terminetters:Larson010152251383
10MAD:Mad Rackets:Fagerquist/Kruglak010162251371
11NHH:Fireballs:Gershfeld/Rosenfeld010132254417

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Kristen Mercuri
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Maria Hacker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Meghan DeWitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Allison Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ashley Davis
published 3
2.71
Paige Terry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Kristine Larson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.62
Luciana Bonifacio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.57
Xu Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Pamela Pascale
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.53
Robin Campot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Michelle Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Asiye Kay Underhill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Alison Broder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Melissa Fogerty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luciana Bonifacio + Kristine Larson7451% games+4.3% vs expected
Asiye Kay Underhill + Kristine Larson2542% games−0.0% vs expected
Alison Broder + Xu Cheng0639% games−8.2% vs expected
Asiye Kay Underhill + Robin Campot044 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Larson + Xu Cheng224 matchesnot enough data
Xu Cheng + Robin Campot314 matchesnot enough data
Paige Terry + Kristen Mercuri123 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Mercuri + Melissa Fogerty303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Mercuri
29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Maria Hacker
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Meghan DeWitt
17W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Allison Armstrong
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ashley Davis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Terry
23W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kristine Larson
36W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Luciana Bonifacio
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Xu Cheng
10W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Pamela Pascale
21W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Robin Campot
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Michelle Cohen
10W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Asiye Kay Underhill
17W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Alison Broder
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Melissa Fogerty
23W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.