Teams

LPATE-NMP

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-17vs LJHiggins/NMPLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarla Williams / Christine Hardin vs Teri Deuel / Whitney Brunk5-7, 6-7
2022-10-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesKarla Williams / Lindsay Payne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-19vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Christine Hardin vs Julie Bosley / Stephanie Campbell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-17vs LWFairer/NMP 7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Arrowood / Karla Williams vs Lisa Alexander / Cristen Morgan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHasina Davidson / Karen Dziadziola vs Sherry Hart / Michelle Potuzak6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-12vs LJHiggins/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Patricia Arrowood vs Jennifer Higgins / Cyndi Johnson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKarla Williams / Kristin Brown vs Katherine Dugan / Ursula Kleimeier6-3, 6-3
2022-09-06vs LJCarruth-Patterson/CSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuAnne Pate / Karen Dziadziola vs Kelly Kennard / Greigh Lucas6-3, 7-5
2022-08-28vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsay Payne / Karen Dziadziola vs Lisa Squatriglia / Jeanne Armstrong5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Brown / Karla Williams vs Leta Wiley / Patricia Baldelli7-6, 6-1
2022-08-22vs LKFinke/NMP Combo 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Reitler / Karen Dziadziola vs Margaret Vermillion / Michelle Skaggs2-6, 1-6
2022-08-16vs LJCarruth-Patterson/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Dziadziola / Suzanne Davis vs Greigh Lucas / Jennifer Jenkins6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Karen Dziadziola
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
LuAnne Pate
published
3.37
Karla Williams
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Lindsay Payne
published
3.22
Holly Pasut
published 3.5
3.03
Kristin Brown
published
3.03
Patricia Arrowood
published
2.99
Sheila Reitler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karla Williams + Karen Dziadziola18759% games+10.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Dziadziola
206W–143L career · 7 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
LuAnne Pate
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lindsay Payne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Holly Pasut
34W–64L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Kristin Brown
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Patricia Arrowood
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Sheila Reitler
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.