Teams

Team 3 Levine - RBGCC Mix 6.5

2025 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-08vs Team 2 CrenshawWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn DeMoors / Tammy Schulman vs Laura Mattis / Christopher Damboise6-2, 7-5
2025-11-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Henningsen / John DeMoors vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-12vs Team 11 Reynolds - Grand SlammersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Schulman / Sohale Razmjou vs Tara Reynolds / Bryan Daguiar7-6, 5-1
2025-11-03vs Team 9 Palacios - NET NINJAS 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAbby Colucci / David Tolley vs Joe Valdez / Ingook Park6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Henningsen / David Tolley vs Amanda Miller / Charles Penunia3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAbby Colucci / Sohale Razmjou vs Brad Haywood / Lynnita Montague-Daddio2-6, 5-7
2025-10-08vs Team 14 Grubbs - Dare Doubles 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Schulman / John DeMoors vs Stephanie Wright / Nathan Bergman4-6, 2-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sohale Razmjou
published
3.34
Tammy Schulman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Tolley
published
3.30
Andrea Henningsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Tonya Turner
published
3.23
Jennie Rokni
published
3.18
Mario Levine
published
2.88
Abby Colucci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
David Tolley
published 3
2.81
James Colucci
published
2.73
Sara Tomlinson
published
Jie Shi
published
John DeMoors
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Henningsen + David Tolley0532% gamesnot enough data
Mario Levine + Lisa Tolley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sohale Razmjou
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Tammy Schulman
81W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Lisa Tolley
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Henningsen
60W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Tonya Turner
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Jennie Rokni
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Abby Colucci
53W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
David Tolley
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
Sara Tomlinson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Jie Shi
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.