Teams

Ridgetop Pugh 6.0

2025 Richmond Doubles Weeknight Women · Richmond Doubles Weeknight 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-28vs ACAC Preusser/Jackson 6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNellie Blair / Elizabeth Manning vs Laura Worrel / Susan Heatley5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Woods / Cindy Sharp vs Rose Bennett / Taryn Adkins2-6, 2-6
2025-04-22vs KRA HussWare 6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Phaup / Grayson Honeycutt vs Julie Ranson / Lindsay Daniel2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMartha Prideaux / Amanda Carr vs Sarah Huss / Louise Bald4-6, 2-6
2025-04-21vs CCV Desch/Turner 6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Phaup / Cindy Sharp vs Ann Gurkin / Elizabeth Carr2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Carr / Nellie Blair vs Elizabeth Crowley / Camp August4-6, 4-6
2025-04-14vs HCC Coates/Hoffler 6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNellie Blair / Britta Janney vs Charlotte Caporale / Sidney Mayer0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Phaup / Madison Woods vs Kendall Hoffler / Alex Mendez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Carr / Elizabeth Manning vs Leah Donham / Meredith Thompson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Doubles Weeknight 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Emily Allanson
published
3.01
Martha Prideaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Britta Janney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Elizabeth Manning
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.33
Cindy Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Amanda Carr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Nicole Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Katherine OHara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Emily Phaup
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Grayson Honeycutt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Madison Woods
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nellie Blair
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Carr + Cindy Sharp2347% games+10.4% vs expected
Nicole Pugh + Amanda Carr044 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Pugh + Cindy Sharp134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Allanson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Martha Prideaux
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Britta Janney
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Elizabeth Manning
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.60
2.5
Cindy Sharp
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Amanda Carr
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Nicole Pugh
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Katherine OHara
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Emily Phaup
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Grayson Honeycutt
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Madison Woods
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nellie Blair
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.