Teams

OC Great Park - Debra 9am

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJennifer Xu / Deping Liu vs Lacey Seward / Tatyana Bukrinsky3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFay Shao / Khanh Vu vs Lauren Prelesnik / Michaela Vitrano7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2024-03-15vs OC Eldorado TC - Lisa -930Won 10
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Pehkoff / Fay Shao vs Jennifer Paz / Laura Karich6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-08vs OC Cabrillo TC - Lesley 830amWon 10
W#1 DoublesYuka Nabangxang / Deping Liu vs Lesley Nishigawara / Keiko Jun6-2, 6-1
2024-02-16Won 20
W#2 DoublesYuka Nabangxang / Deping Liu vs Maureen Conter / Karin Wiseman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFay Shao / Emily Zhang vs Sandi Kato / Priscilla Granger6-2, 6-3
2024-01-26vs OC YLCC - Nancy - 11amLost 01
L#2 DoublesFay Shao / Alison Thorne vs Jeanie Attaway / Monica Kirby7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-01-12vs OC The Huntington Club - JackieLost 02
L#2 DoublesFay Shao / Jennifer Xu vs Rosalinda Fazio / Lisa Watkins6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDeping Liu / Yiwei Chu vs Samantha Bloom / Lisa Wellman6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Susie Kim
published
3.33
Karla Padova
published
3.28
Vena Haydon
published
3.23
Fay Shao
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Khanh Vu
published
3.06
Deping Liu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Yiwei Chu
published
2.90
Gina Moore
published
2.51
Chau Phan
published 3
Jacqueline Pehkoff
published
Sheryl Dalmacio
published
Yuka Nabangxang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fay Shao + Deping Liu2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
Karla Padova
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Vena Haydon
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Fay Shao
49W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
Khanh Vu
17W–32L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Deping Liu
86W–111L career · 4 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Yiwei Chu
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.91
Gina Moore
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Chau Phan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Jacqueline Pehkoff
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheryl Dalmacio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuka Nabangxang
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.