Teams

Suarez

2022 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-13vs AATXLost 01
L#1 DoublesArun Chokkalingam / Tomas Suarez vs Matthew Cao / Nicholas Verghese6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-02vs SainiLost 01
L#1 DoublesRajiv Saxena / Tomas Suarez vs Madhu Jagannathan / Sai Akshay Loganda Khumaresh3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-21vs ParrishLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Gustinis / Jim Vana vs Tam Ly / Charles Thompson1-6, 4-6
2022-07-07vs The Ball SlappersWon 10
W#1 DoublesArun Chokkalingam / Tomas Suarez vs Aditya Iyer / Brandon Nakata6-2, 6-1
2022-06-29vs Line TicklersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Gustinis / Jim Vana vs Donny Baugh / Michael Cheong1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Arun Chokkalingam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Jim Vana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Mark Gustinis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Rajiv Saxena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Tomas Suarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Gustinis + Jim Vana31044% games−5.4% vs expected
Rajiv Saxena + Mark Gustinis7553% games−6.4% vs expected
Rajiv Saxena + Jim Vana2339% gamesnot enough data
Arun Chokkalingam + Tomas Suarez134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Gustinis + Tomas Suarez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Arun Chokkalingam
57W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Jim Vana
87W–97L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Mark Gustinis
24W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Rajiv Saxena
14W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Tomas Suarez
21W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.