Teams

Stoffer

2026 55&Over Men · 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs Bologna 9.0 Men 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesChad Stoffer / Michael Dorsey vs Jeffery Irving / Paul Arciero7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Marsh / Chris Laflamme vs Dylan Davis / Thomas Schmitz2-6, 0-6
2026-07-30vs Bologna 9.0 Men 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Marsh / Chris Hanley vs Sherwin So / Paul Arciero6-7, 2-2
L#2 DoublesGeorge Werle / Matt Picardi vs Patrick Bologna / Thomas Schmitz2-6, 1-6
2026-07-25vs Bradley 55+ 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChad Stoffer / Chris Hanley vs William Mendler / Steven Underwood2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Culotti / Nixon de Tarnowsky vs Robert Connor / Kevin Winn1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-25vs Bradley 55+ 9.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesChad Stoffer / Chris Hanley vs Eriksen Stropp / Michael Leopold1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNixon de Tarnowsky / Mark Culotti vs Ezika Unobagha / James Alexander2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-11vs Bradley 55+ 9.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Dorsey / Michael Marsh vs Scott Smith / Shawn James1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Akker / Robert Farley vs Ben Bradley / Eriksen Stropp6-2, 6-3
2026-06-08vs Bologna 9.0 Men 55+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Hanley / Penko Ivanov vs Dylan Davis / Thomas Schmitz7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Picardi / Chad Stoffer vs Dave Picchi / Thomas Bain2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeorge Werle / Chris Laflamme vs Jeffery Irving / Paul Arciero4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Robert Farley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Michael Akker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Michael Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.75
Chad Stoffer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.69
Chris Hanley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Chris Laflamme
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
George Werle
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Matt Picardi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Culotti
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Dorsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nixon de Tarnowsky
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Penko Ivanov
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Werle + Chris Laflamme3352% gamesnot enough data
Chris Hanley + Matt Picardi134 matchesnot enough data
George Werle + Nixon de Tarnowsky033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Hanley + Michael Marsh213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Picardi + Michael Akker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Farley
28W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Michael Akker
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
Michael Marsh
61W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Chad Stoffer
87W–36L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Chris Hanley
50W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Chris Laflamme
28W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
George Werle
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Matt Picardi
5W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
Mark Culotti
4W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Dorsey
25W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nixon de Tarnowsky
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Penko Ivanov
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.