Teams

UPTA40S/Meredith/ACAC

2025 UPTA Singles 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Singles Men - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-16vs UPTA40S/Rosopa/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 SinglesSambi Reddy Bonthu vs Marion Hanna3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs Lloyd Orr6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRick Conard vs JAVIER CANALES-ZAVALA6-3, 6-4
2025-11-06vs UPTA40S/Mahaffey/GTCLost 03
L#1 SinglesSambi Reddy Bonthu vs Adalberto Taguchi2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFrank Powell vs Marcelo Lavigne3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesGrant Hunter vs Andrew Mahaffey6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-26vs UPTA40S/Rosopa/BrookstoneLost 12
L#1 SinglesGrant Hunter vs Elliott Dykes1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSambi Reddy Bonthu vs Marion Hanna6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesRick Conard vs Lloyd Orr7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-19vs UPTA40S/Mahaffey/GTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesFrank Powell vs Adalberto Taguchi1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSambi Reddy Bonthu vs William Hochet6-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs James Ball6-3, 6-4
2025-10-05vs UPTA40S/Rosopa/BrookstoneSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSambi Reddy Bonthu vs JAVIER CANALES-ZAVALA6-0, 7-6
L#2 SinglesRick Conard vs Scott Mouzon2-6, 5-7
2025-09-28vs UPTA40S/Mahaffey/GTCLost 03
L#1 SinglesGrant Hunter vs Adalberto Taguchi0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRick Conard vs Andrew Mahaffey4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesHarvinder Sidhu vs James Ball3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Singles Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Frank Powell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.70
Grant Hunter
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.64
Sambi Reddy Bonthu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.53
Harvinder Sidhu
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.51
Rick Conard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Brad Meredith
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harvinder Sidhu + Brad Meredith6260% games+19.9% vs expected
Harvinder Sidhu + Frank Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Frank Powell
54W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Grant Hunter
29W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Sambi Reddy Bonthu
18W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Harvinder Sidhu
48W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Rick Conard
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Brad Meredith
58W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.