Teams

Morris-CC

2025 CORTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-01vs CORTA/Victoria GreenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Elizabeth Cawthorne / Paige Penner vs Gail Burgos / Sherry Phillips2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Morris / Tracey Olds vs Giovanna Guerra-Troche / Natsue Haniu6-4, 6-3
2025-06-28vs CORTA/Victoria GreenWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Davis / Janell McKenzie vs Alexis Chandler / Gail Burgos7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Morris / Lynne Williamson vs Mallory Carroll / Jamie Williams3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracey Olds / Dayna Johnson vs Jennifer Milton / Giovanna Guerra-Troche7-5, 6-3
2025-06-25vs Averett/Jones-GILost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Harden / Alix Toelle vs Eve Kilpatrick / Sally Watkins4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTiffany Davis / Gabrielle Davis vs Sarah Fletcher / Candra McRae5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracey Olds / Jennifer Chancey vs Kecia Cawthorne / Ali Cichos7-6, 6-1
2025-06-14vs Averett/Jones-GIWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanell McKenzie / Sarah Prichard vs Anna Varner / Sally Watkins6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJayce Cunningham / Alix Toelle vs Shannon Galligan / Elizabeth Borom3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDayna Johnson / Tracey Olds vs Michele Snipes / Kecia Cawthorne6-4, 6-2
2025-06-04vs CORTA/Victoria GreenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnie Kirkland / Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne vs Alexis Chandler / Rebecca DeLoach3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmber Harden / Tiffany Davis vs Mallory Carroll / Jamie Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-28vs Averett/Jones-GISplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Elizabeth Cawthorne / Sarah Prichard vs Eve Kilpatrick / Tracy Stokes6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDayna Johnson / Paola Franco vs Candra McRae / Rachel LeRoy6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Annie Kirkland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Brooke Nail
published 4
3.39
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Tricia Keller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Janell McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Sarah Prichard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Lynne Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Paige Penner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Wanda Morpeth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Amber Harden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Gabrielle Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Alix Toelle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Dayna Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Jennifer Chancey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Paola Franco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Tracey Olds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Laura Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Kimberly Gill
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jayce Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alix Toelle + Amber Harden4255% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Gill + Jennifer Chancey1435% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Olds + Jennifer Chancey314 matchesnot enough data
Dayna Johnson + Wanda Morpeth314 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Keller + Annie Kirkland404 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Olds + Dayna Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Gabrielle Davis + Amber Harden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annie Kirkland
80W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Brooke Nail
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Tricia Keller
52W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Janell McKenzie
33W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Sarah Prichard
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Lynne Williamson
60W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Paige Penner
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Wanda Morpeth
26W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Amber Harden
42W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Gabrielle Davis
30W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
3.5
Alix Toelle
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Dayna Johnson
60W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
Jennifer Chancey
68W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
Paola Franco
40W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Tracey Olds
52W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Laura Schneider
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.65
Kimberly Gill
40W–62L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
Jayce Cunningham
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.