Teams

LATA18/ESTES/CTFC

2026 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Men - 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs LATA18/Turner/LCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesTimothy Hamrick / Kyle Olenchuk vs Garrett Prochaska / Brandon Doty6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTrevor Olenchuk / Zack Robertson vs Lane Small / Byron Byars6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesParker Venator / Guy Wood vs Cory Muncill / Oliver Moore6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-10vs LATA18/Kitchens/LCTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJack Woods / Kyle Olenchuk vs Kevin Felkel / Tyler Tracy6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Kaczynski / Eric Holt vs Brian Heaberlin / Aaron Hilton5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGustavo Bencid / Guy Wood vs Mark Duncan / Austin Duncan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-03vs LATA18/Turner/LCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesTimothy Hamrick / Kyle Olenchuk vs Dawson Thornton / Mark Rugg6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesZack Robertson / Trevor Olenchuk vs Elliot Turner / Will Mckenzie5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Stein / Lawson Davis vs Joshua Simons / Lane Small3-6, 3-6
2026-07-20vs LATA18/Kitchens/LCTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTimothy Hamrick / Barry Mathews vs Glenn Kitchens / Larry Ellisor6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Kaczynski / Colin Raynor vs Kevin Felkel / Tyler Tracy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGustavo Bencid / Guy Wood vs Keith LaQuay / Cory Cox6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Parker Venator
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Jack Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Timothy Hamrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Matthew Stein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Andrew Kaczynski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Gustavo Bencid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Jim Wescott
published
3.72
Zack Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Joshua Estes
published
3.57
Guy Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Eric Holt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Barry Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Lawson Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Trevor Olenchuk
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Kyle Olenchuk
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.42
Colin Raynor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawson Davis + Kyle Olenchuk5260% games+14.0% vs expected
Jack Woods + Parker Venator2451% games+8.1% vs expected
Timothy Hamrick + Zack Robertson224 matchesnot enough data
Lawson Davis + Trevor Olenchuk303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Venator
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
Jack Woods
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
Timothy Hamrick
44W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
Matthew Stein
37W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Andrew Kaczynski
45W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Gustavo Bencid
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Jim Wescott
23W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Zack Robertson
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Joshua Estes
27W–23L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Guy Wood
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Eric Holt
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Barry Mathews
212W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Lawson Davis
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Trevor Olenchuk
28W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Kyle Olenchuk
21W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Colin Raynor
38W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.