Teams

Payne Park Evans

2021 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 3.5 W Thursday

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-17vs River Strand KussroWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Pipes / Christen Tooley vs Jane Ellis / Annemarie Neubecker6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarisa Perhaes / Jane Welihozkiy vs Gisele Sweeney / Barbara Walsh6-0, 6-1
2021-06-14vs Longwood HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Ochsenreiter / Christen Tooley vs Sigi Moriece / Marianne Zentz6-0, 1-0
2021-06-10vs University Park ReeveWon 30
W#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Cecile Wooster6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarisa Perhaes / Christen Tooley vs Mary Barry / Dodie Shuert6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBonita Fyala / Jane Welihozkiy vs Terry Williamson / Deborah Lionetti6-2, 6-1
2021-05-27Won 20
W#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Marie Guillet6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Ochsenreiter / Christen Tooley vs Heidi Berry / Beth Bartlett6-4, 6-1
2021-05-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Judith Hynes6-2, 6-1
2021-05-06vs Laurel Oak RobbinsWon 10
W#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Sandra Poston7-5, 7-6
2021-04-29vs Island Walk ConnollyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Pipes / Christen Tooley vs Trish Connolly / Linda Sleet6-1, 6-3
2021-04-22vs LWR JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Sheridan / Jane Welihozkiy vs Claudia Kelly / Cheryl Johnson6-0, 6-4
2021-04-08vs Sarasota - LWR LloydLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie Pipes vs Martina Kralickova6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBonita Fyala / Christen Tooley vs Lisa Tschetter / Sandra Barkey2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Christen Tooley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.35
Bonita Fyala
published 3.5
3.24
Julie Pipes
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Robin Sheridan
published
Jane Welihozkiy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Evans
published
Linda Mulcahy
published
Pamela Mousseau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Pipes + Christen Tooley13658% games+6.2% vs expected
Bonita Fyala + Pamela Mousseau123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christen Tooley
60W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Bonita Fyala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Julie Pipes
82W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Robin Sheridan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Jane Welihozkiy
49W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Evans
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Mulcahy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Mousseau
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.