Teams

KY/LOU/Bean

2025 USTA TRI-LEVEL 55 & OVER ADULT · Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-21vs KY/LOU/Moore/BrayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanie Bean / Stephanie Young vs Michele Coan / Carolyn Chou2-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs KY/LOU/Stone/DaltonWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Young / Penny DeVenuto vs Kimberly Polter / Tammy Pollock5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-12vs KY/LOU/Stone/DaltonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Walker / Stephanie Young vs Kimberly Polter / Tammy Pollock4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Madge Dennis
published
3.73
Sue Condict
published
3.63
Katie Bonn
published
3.57
Miriam Long
published
3.57
Jane St Clair
published
3.56
Janet Brumley
published
3.27
Sandra Sorrels
published
Beth McCulley
published 3.5
Brenda Snook
published 3.5
3.19
Penny DeVenuto
published
3.14
Janie Bean
published
2.97
Stephanie Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Amy Lampton
published 3
2.72
Patricia Dye
published
Nancy Donohue
published
Peggy Hash
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane St Clair + Janie Bean4547% games−7.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madge Dennis
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Sue Condict
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Katie Bonn
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Miriam Long
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Jane St Clair
19W–20L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Janet Brumley
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Sandra Sorrels
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Beth McCulley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Snook
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Penny DeVenuto
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Janie Bean
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Stephanie Young
123W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Amy Lampton
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Patricia Dye
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Nancy Donohue
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Hash
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.