Teams

Sunset All Day

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-14vs NR FIREBALLS FALL 25Split 11
L#1 DoublesGina Vazquez / Deborah Cassar vs Kristin Snowden / Brooke Roth0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Clark / SANDI WISE vs Shannon Ellis / Bodee Lee6-2, 6-3
2025-12-07vs WestLake WARRIORSWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Clark / SANDI WISE vs LAUREN WILKINS / Hannah Buehring6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-30vs Sunset Serve-ivorsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSANDI WISE / Julie Clark vs Inna Skripnikova / Andrea Pakula6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDana Lawrence / Keressa Garland vs Jennifer Khiem / JANE HUANG6-2, 6-2
2025-11-01vs WAC Ninjas Fall 2025Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Clark / SANDI WISE vs Susan Cass / Frances Kharaghani6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanice Pinnell / Gina Vazquez vs Susie Castle / Lynn Abroms6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGrace Berman / Claudia Bay vs Selina Cheng / Lynda Balletta3-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs V- LLW Slice Girls- HibnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Clark / SANDI WISE vs Barbara Heitman / Dana Hibner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeressa Garland / Wendy Brown vs Kathleen Kimball / Marilyn Germann0-6, 4-6
2025-10-12vs Moorpark Acing GracefullyLost 01
L#1 DoublesSANDI WISE / Julie Clark vs Cheri Ackermann / Wendy Schoenburg6-7, 6-7
2025-10-05vs Royal AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesSANDI WISE / Julie Clark vs Annie Mitchell / Jo Ann Thrailkill7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle Lambert / Gina Vazquez vs Deborah Kerr-Orlik / Michelle Parent7-5, 6-2
2025-09-21vs Las Posas MimosasLost 01
L#1 DoublesSANDI WISE / Julie Clark vs Julie Gisler / Eva Ching Guo3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Laura Berger
published
3.45
Ina Kim
published 3.5
3.39
Janice Pinnell
published
3.38
SANDI WISE
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.27
Isabella Richards
published 3.5
Grace Berman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Dana Lawrence
published 3.5
3.24
Kate Centanni
published
3.23
Jennifer Meckfessel
published
3.13
Gina Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Wendy Brown
published
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
2.96
Marie Smith
published
2.96
Leah Cassar
published
2.90
Claudia Bay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keressa Garland + Wendy Brown3257% games+8.6% vs expected
Keressa Garland + Claudia Bay2446% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Bay + Gina Vazquez044 matchesnot enough data
Dana Lawrence + Jennifer Meckfessel404 matchesnot enough data
Gina Vazquez + Jennifer Meckfessel224 matchesnot enough data
Grace Berman + SANDI WISE033 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Claudia Bay213 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Gina Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Berger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Isabella Richards
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Grace Berman
29W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dana Lawrence
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennifer Meckfessel
29W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gina Vazquez
95W–140L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Leah Cassar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Claudia Bay
67W–75L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.