Teams

Wyndham Northstars Houff

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-11-06vs MAC PettitWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Douglas Scammell vs Rob Kirkconnell / Michael Montgomery6-2, 6-2
2023-10-24vs HCC Blankley (men)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Douglas Scammell vs Douglas Gray / Wood Gyory6-1, 6-2
2023-10-17vs Burkwood CarterLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Brad Houff vs William Walton / LUDINEI PICELLI3-6, 2-6
2023-10-10vs KRA FenchukWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Brian Zollinhofer vs Jory Brinkerhoff / Beverly Clary6-3, 6-3
2023-10-05vs Belmont GauthierWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Houff / Brian Zollinhofer vs Mohan Bhandari / Vernon Heishman6-2, 6-4
2023-10-04vs Huguenot Park StephensWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Brian Zollinhofer vs Jay Abbud / Paul Calamita6-4, 7-5
2023-10-03vs Westwood LeftwichWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Brian Zollinhofer vs Brewster Brown / Gil Elmaleh7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Houff / Brian Zollinhofer vs Chad Anderson / Timothy Moore6-4, 7-6
2023-09-12vs ACAC RichmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Douglas Scammell vs Miguel Romero / Christopher Chandler6-3, 7-6
2023-09-05vs TCRC Young's RACWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Brian Zollinhofer vs Jeremy Theisen / Andy Tucker6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Brian Zollinhofer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Douglas Scammell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Brad Houff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Jesse Pasco
published
3.42
STEVEN ROBERTS
published
3.27
Doug Blouch
published
3.24
Bert Foreman
published 3.5
3.09
Jay Harter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Houff + Brian Zollinhofer12560% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Scammell + Brian Zollinhofer11164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Zollinhofer
211W–79L career · 10 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Douglas Scammell
100W–57L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Brad Houff
114W–106L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jesse Pasco
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
STEVEN ROBERTS
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Doug Blouch
26W–29L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bert Foreman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Jay Harter
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.