Teams

Hit it 2.0 (FLEXIBLE)

2023 Summer · Fall Flex Singles (YER)

1 player · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings11 teams · Fall Flex Singles (YER)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Guittet (FLEXIBLE)4141333
2Chan3232438
3Gannon - Daytime 4.53232438
4Hit it 2.0 (FLEXIBLE)3232650
5YQY (FLEXIBLE)2323544
6Summer Fun (FLEXIBLE)2323635
7Morton2323635
8Rosauer (FLEXIBLE)2323741
9Lana - Summer (Flexible)2323750
10Runnicles05051060
11Silly Believer (FLEXIBLE)05051058

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jennifer Vana
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Vana
148W–145L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.