Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-18vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Langan / Van Hughes vs Cherie Tan / Dodi Stringfellow3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-11vs Andresen - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Van Hughes vs Lisa Andresen / Natalie Mcelhany3-6, 0-6
2024-05-28vs Tan - SHLWon 10
W#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Bonnie Bucco vs Cherie Tan / Maria Hicks4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-21vs Andresen - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesSue Nast / Mary Bryan vs Tanya Hughes / Emily Ioakim4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-14vs Manziek - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesBonnie Bucco / Van Hughes vs Jennifer Capozzoli / Barbara Montano6-4, 7-6
2024-05-07vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Van Hughes vs Sophie Rudman / Melanie DiLoreto4-6, 3-6
2024-04-30vs Andresen - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Van Hughes vs Valerie Wilson / Paige Davis6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-23vs Manziek - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Lisa Greskovich vs Barbara Montano / Klara Szalai5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Gloria Langan vs Tammie Coco / Marie Steen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Brooklyn Meadows
published 3.5
3.38
Van Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.31
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
3.29
Gloria Langan
published
3.28
Sue Nast
published
3.26
Bonnie Bucco
published 3.5
Caroline Struck
published 3.5
3.21
Mary Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
3.03
Sally Bergosh
published
Joyce Cook
published
Lisa Greskovich
published
Polly Armstrong
published
Sharon Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Van Hughes + Mary Bryan3844% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Gloria Langan
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Caroline Struck
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Katie Cooper-Bussell
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Joyce Cook
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Greskovich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Polly Armstrong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.