Teams

Toluca Lake Love All/Berman-Aladjem/Toluca

2026 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chicks with Sticks/Whitmer-Hope/Paseo000000
2Vino Vixens/Nold-Orwin/Paseo000000
3Great Shots/Ho-Chang/Scholl000000
4Toluca Lake Love All/Berman-Aladjem/Toluca000000
5Nikki's Tennis Crew/Robbins/Balboa000000
6Sets in the City/Bramstedt-SanMiguel/Burbank000000
7High Strung/Doryon-Engelhardt/VNSO000000
8Simply Smashing 3.0/MacEwan-Scott/Burbank000000
9Girl Krush/Ferraro/Porter Valley000000
10Net Assets/Wu/CSUN000000
11Racketeers/Peralta-Brooks/Burbank000000
12Deuces Wild/Gold/MHCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Laura Aladjem
published
2.83
Charissa Smith
published 3
2.70
Anna Bowen
published 3
2.67
Amy Yanow
published 3
2.66
Lillie Scheer
published
2.64
Ann Garrett
published 2.5
2.62
Marcia Berman
published
2.62
Vicki Ellis
published
2.60
Janet Garrison
published
2.56
Gail Fisher
published
2.56
Laura Gary
published
2.55
Jean Su
published
2.54
2.42
Melissa Turai
published
2.37
Linda Benjamin
published
Laurel Reese
published
Teresa Lin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Turai + Ann Garrett5263% games+11.9% vs expected
Laura Aladjem + Marcia Berman2346% games−6.3% vs expected
Charissa Smith + Laura Aladjem3252% gamesnot enough data
Jean Su + Charissa Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Charissa Smith + Marcia Berman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Aladjem
16W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Charissa Smith
18W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Anna Bowen
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Amy Yanow
4W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Lillie Scheer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Ann Garrett
11W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
Marcia Berman
8W–16L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Vicki Ellis
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
Janet Garrison
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Gail Fisher
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Laura Gary
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Jean Su
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Alison Wallendorf
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Melissa Turai
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Linda Benjamin
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.37
Laurel Reese
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Lin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.