← Teams

CHARB-Jackson

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Carlin Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Jonathan Quon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Lance Berkey
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.47
Tom Lonergan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Anthony Valenzuela
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Craig Mills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Steve Carns
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-11-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCarlin Jackson / Anthony Valenzuela vs William Campbell / Bill Henderson6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTom Lonergan / Lance Berkey vs Jeffrey Krum / David Hill6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKen Crowley / Steve Carns vs John Popplewell / Tim Leatherman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAnthony Valenzuela / Carlin Jackson vs Len Morales / Tony Khamsouk6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLance Berkey / Steve Carns vs Robert Ferek / Tim Luangrath6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Crowley / Scott Mayer vs John Christiaan / Frank Olson6-3, 6-1
2022-11-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Carns / Ken Crowley vs John Hall / William Hergenhan7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLance Berkey / Tom Lonergan vs Brian Posewitz / Christopher Graham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Mayer / Jonathan Quon vs Rudy Martinez / Thomas Turnbull7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-11-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTom Lonergan / Lance Berkey vs JT Smith / Michael Kazangian2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarlin Jackson / Ramon Delapaz vs Jim Hamlik / Steve Sun6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKevin Oloughlin / Anthony Valenzuela vs Peter Cutrona / Kurt Rylander6-1, 6-2
2022-10-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCarlin Jackson / Ramon Delapaz vs Chris Eddy / Jae Joon Kang6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTom Lonergan / Lance Berkey vs Steve Fogg / Joseph Collins6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Carns / Craig Mills vs Mike Farrell / Mike Booth6-0, 7-6
2022-10-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLance Berkey / Tom Lonergan vs Gary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Carns / Ken Crowley vs Tim Brink / Perry Sides6-2, 6-3
2022-09-24Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLance Berkey / Kevin Oloughlin vs Patrick Maginnis / Tony Moreno6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathan Quon / Scott Mayer vs Warren Hill / Patrick Harkin6-1, 6-4
2022-09-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRamon Delapaz / Carlin Jackson vs Steve Eggerts / Terence Gariety3-6, 2-0
W#2 DoublesLance Berkey / Kevin Oloughlin vs Joe Entler / Keith Gordon6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnthony Valenzuela / Craig Mills vs William Malloch / Vilath Oudomphong6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carlin Jackson
134W–66L career
0%99%0%
3.77
4
Jonathan Quon
69W–67L career
2%97%1%
3.76
4
Lance Berkey
59W–40L career
3%97%0%
3.68
3.5
Tom Lonergan
104W–99L career
0%87%13%
3.47
3.5
Anthony Valenzuela
37W–64L career
0%88%12%
3.45
3.5
Craig Mills
58W–89L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Steve Carns
36W–46L career · type A
not enough data
—
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.