Teams

V - Arroyo Vista Match Makers

2022 USTA Adult 18 &Over - WD Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Irene Anderson
published 4
3.65
Jami Shane
published 4
3.58
Tracee Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.50
Lisa Iezza
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.41
Sophia McCreary
published
3.37
Lynne F Krueger
published
3.35
Mindy Czubiak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Barbara Heitman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.72
Hope Jones
published 3
Patricia Mueller
published
Rachel Ramirez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Heitman + Tracee Nilsson61446% games−3.9% vs expected
Mindy Czubiak + Barbara Heitman21138% games−6.9% vs expected
Mindy Czubiak + Tracee Nilsson1441% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Giammarrusco + Lynne F Krueger134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irene Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jami Shane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Lisa Iezza
149W–108L career · 9 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sophia McCreary
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
Lynne F Krueger
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
4
Mindy Czubiak
36W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Heitman
133W–149L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Hope Jones
3W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Patricia Mueller
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Ramirez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.