Teams

12 Willow Oaks 2.5 Kays

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-05vs 8 Woodlake - Schiavone CorraziniLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelli Burnett vs Kim Corazzini0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPatty Leto Diradour vs Stefanie Sempek2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJanet Dwyer vs Erika Brown3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-11-03vs 13 Magnolia Green SheldonWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnn Kuhn vs Rachel Sheldon6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKelli Burnett vs Katie McKenney7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJanet Dwyer vs Melissa Scalese6-0, 6-3
2025-10-27vs 11 ACAC Routree/EaveyLost 02
L#1 SinglesKendall Maximini vs Ann Mann2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesPatty Leto Diradour vs Ladonna Sewell4-6, 2-6
2025-10-20vs 9 Rockwood Cove Ladies - MooreWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnn Kuhn vs Joslyn Wolberg6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKendall Maximini vs Amy Cross6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRosemary Begin vs Emily Ashton6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAsha Kays vs Jaclyn Tracey3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKendall Maximini vs Jennifer Aaron3-6, 1-6
2025-10-06vs 17 MTC 2.5 Singles - ChenevertLost 12
L#1 SinglesKelli Burnett vs Sarah Stanley2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJanet Dwyer vs Margie Adcock0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPatty Leto Diradour vs Brittney Hackworth6-3, 6-2
2025-09-24vs 10 ACAC - AdkinsWon 21
W#1 SinglesAsha Kays vs Taryn Adkins6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelli Burnett vs Jenessa Lopez6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRosemary Begin vs Margaret Phipps1-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs 16 Avalon HallettWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnn Kuhn vs Cristin Traylor6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAsha Kays vs Jennifer Levine6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Ann Kuhn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Asha Kays
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.38
Kendall Maximini
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.28
Kelli Burnett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
1.96
Patty Leto Diradour
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
1.91
Rosemary Begin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
1.84
Janet Dwyer
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Asha Kays + Ann Kuhn404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Kuhn
42W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Asha Kays
34W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Kendall Maximini
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Kelli Burnett
20W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Patty Leto Diradour
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Rosemary Begin
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Janet Dwyer
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.