Teams

OC LLW RSC Lifetime - Dewi

2021 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-19vs OC Coto De Caza - TiffenyWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Colson / Nedka Stills vs Tiffney Beckloff / Lissett MacHado6-2, 6-2
2021-11-12vs OC NBTC - SheriWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Colson / Elizabeth Harris vs Stephanie Gerken / Tanja Fournier6-2, 6-0
2021-10-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesDewi Johnson / Stephanie Colson vs Helen Chen / Frances Okura4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-10-01vs OC Coto De Caza - TiffenyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeganMary Mills / Stephanie Colson vs Sarah Cieslik / Yuka Nabangxang3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Samantha Ackad
published
3.32
Linda LaRue
published
3.30
Stephanie Colson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Harris
published 3.5
3.24
Chrissy Bird
published 3.5
3.13
MeganMary Mills
published
3.00
Mariah Velasco
published
2.96
Jeanette Delaney
published
2.90
Christa Long
published 3
2.89
2.78
Christy Tuverson
published 3
Cori Goudchaux
published 3
2.56
Kelley Birmingham
published
Nedka Stills
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanette Delaney + Mariah Velasco8359% games+6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Ackad
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
Linda LaRue
9W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Harris
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Chrissy Bird
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
MeganMary Mills
15W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%16%84%
3.13
Mariah Velasco
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jeanette Delaney
24W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Christa Long
11W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Britney Scoffield
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Christy Tuverson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Cori Goudchaux
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelley Birmingham
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56
Nedka Stills
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.