Teams

USTA Campus-Hemphill

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 40 & Over- SPRING-DAY · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over- Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-06vs Country Club of Orlando-MillerWon 20
W#1 SinglesXia Yang vs Amanda Norvell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Foster / Lorna Goodfellow vs Carrie Miller / Nancy Chapin6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesJazzie Josol / Meriel Donahey vs Meredith Gallagher / Yaneth Monsalve6-2, 6-4
2025-05-16vs USTA Campus-VinsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Victoria Chiu / Jazzie Josol vs Leticia Monge / Ella Simsek3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-02Lost 01
L#4 DoublesMeriel Donahey / Jazzie Josol vs Madge Terrell / Laura Hanlon4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeriel Donahey / Jazzie Josol vs Victoria Karen / Kim Han2-6, 5-7
2025-04-11vs Lake Cane-Yari-Kender/PhanLost 01
L#4 DoublesWyetta Ford / Jazzie Josol vs Brianne Larsen / Mardy Goote2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Meriel Donahey
published
3.21
Xia Yang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Jennie Caudill
published
3.12
Maria Victoria Chiu
published
3.12
Hela Ghariani
published
3.00
Jazzie Josol
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.96
Julie Hemphill
published
2.79
Kelli Alexander
published
Laura Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wyetta Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Hemphill + Hela Ghariani5354% games+13.6% vs expected
Maria Victoria Chiu + Jazzie Josol213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meriel Donahey
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Xia Yang
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennie Caudill
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Maria Victoria Chiu
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Hela Ghariani
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Jazzie Josol
45W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Julie Hemphill
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Kelli Alexander
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Laura Foster
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wyetta Ford
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.